Linux-Networking Digest #497, Volume #12 Tue, 7 Sep 99 12:13:46 EDT
Contents:
linux software for a Hybrid Model N-202 Cable Modem (Telephone return) ("Flash98")
Re: Can't get Win98 clients to logon to Samba (Thomas R. Shannon)
Re: Modem HELP!!! ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Weird network problem with SuSE 6.1 (Glen Harris)
Red hat linux 5.1 logging of events ("tronn r�tvoll")
Re: ppp problems ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Multiple Intel Etherexpress Solved.(?) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
PPP error ("Matt")
Re: Browsers and Linux (trader)
Re: Win98 -> Linux -> Internet (trader)
rtl8139 modules for network cards - help ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Problem getting direct serial PPP connection from WinNT to Linux ("GPusch")
Re: Intel EEPro/10 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Alias user in Linux or Samba? ("mms67")
Which HOWTO (Anders Peterson)
Re: D-Link DFE 530-TX - not workin under RHL6 (ZYON)
how to add second ethernet ??? (Sahin Akkargan)
Re: sendmail not relaying external mail ("Rick Orwig")
PPP - Hung Modem ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Flash98" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: linux software for a Hybrid Model N-202 Cable Modem (Telephone return)
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 1999 20:19:15 -0400
Anyone know how I can find software for or set up my linux box to use my
Hybrid N-202 cable modem w/ telephone return?
HELP!!!!!!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas R. Shannon)
Subject: Re: Can't get Win98 clients to logon to Samba
Date: 07 Sep 1999 09:02:43 -0500
Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Running Win98 Clients
> Server is RedHat 6 with Samba 2.0.5a
>
Did you also alter the Win98 registry on the machine you are logining
in from?
See the docs.
Tom
--
Quote of the day for Friday, 3 September, 1999:
"The only limits are, as always, those of vision."
- James Broughton
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Modem HELP!!!
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 1999 13:32:51 GMT
You might try ATX3DT <phone number> instead of ATDT <phone number>.
This may help.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruno Barreiros) wrote:
> I use KPPP to start my connection, I try to start one, the modem
start
> working but the modem are not hable to get the dial tone and I know
why.
> It's because I have voice mail in my phone line and the signal is not
> constant (it's like bip ---- bip, not bipppppppppppppp al normally).
I
> don't know if you understand what I am saying.
>
> In windows I had this same problem but if you go to control panel --
modems
> -- connection -- in call preferences there is a check box that says:
wait
> for dial tone before dialing, I have unchecked this box and now this
works
> good in windows, if I check the box it stops to work. Do you know
what I am
> talking about?
> Any helps? I am using Suse Linux.
> Thanks for your pacience...
>
> please answer to my email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> best, Bruno
>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Glen Harris)
Subject: Weird network problem with SuSE 6.1
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 1999 11:28:18 GMT
Hi there. I've had SuSE 6.1 running for quite some time both
at home and at work, but just recently my home system has started
having problems with ethernet networking. It's PPP modem link
to work still operates perfectly, however.
The system is a PII/350 system and NE2000 clone card connected
to a 10 base-T hub. Also connected to the hub are another SuSE
Pentium and a Slackware Pentium Laptop. The two pentium systems
can ping/telnet/ftp to each other perfectly, however the PII can
only ping to another machine or be pinged. Both hostname and IP
pings work fine. But, when trying to use any other protocol, the
connection times out.
Here's an example of a telnet:
astfgl@dis:~ > telnet 192.168.1.5
Trying 192.168.1.5...
[at this point nothing happens for many, many minutes]
Running a netstat before the telnet times out gives the following:
astfgl@dis:~ > netstat | head
Active Internet connections (w/o servers)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State
tcp 0 1 dis.hell.org.au:1372 dual.hell.org.au:telnet SYN_SENT
Running a tcpdump while this is happening generates the following,
which is repeated until finally the telnet times out. The hub lights
flicker sporadically while the arp traffic is going back and forth.
21:18:23.088332 arp who-has dual.hell.org.au tell dis.hell.org.au
21:18:23.088995 arp reply dual.hell.org.au is-at 0:80:c7:7a:bb:90
21:18:27.080707 dual.hell.org.au.telnet > dis.hell.org.au.1377: S 2825157604:28
21:18:30.420635 dis.hell.org.au.1378 > dual.hell.org.au.telnet: S 3595019236:35
21:18:30.421961 dual.hell.org.au.telnet > dis.hell.org.au.1378: S 4182774870:41
21:18:33.418112 dual.hell.org.au.telnet > dis.hell.org.au.1378: S 4182774870:41
21:18:33.418355 dis.hell.org.au.1378 > dual.hell.org.au.telnet: S 3595019236:35
Now, I assumed that maybe inetd was trying to do some type of RARP
authentication or something, so I set up named with forward and reverse
mapping, etc. Same thing happens.
Does anyone have any idea? This is really beginning to get on my
nerves.
Thanks, glen.
------------------------------
From: "tronn r�tvoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Red hat linux 5.1 logging of events
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 1999 11:29:13 GMT
We have a Cisco router, and wants to run scripts and log its events.
We have now installed Redhat linux 5.1 on a server as a gateway to the
Internet and are wondering if there is any programs for Linux that we can
use for this. Before we used win NT hyperterminal.
Tronn
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ppp problems
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 1999 14:26:27 GMT
The SIGHUP exit from pppd is the same problem I'm
incurring. The script is fine (I can test it in
minicom, exit and start pppd - and it works) -
for some reason, the second ppp goes up after a
"connect 'chat ...', pppd dies...
In article <7q4dhc$h7v$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Dominic Tynes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am unable to connect to a ppp dial-in server.
>
> I am running RH 6.0 with an external 56K US
Robotics modem. Dial-in works
> under 98.
>
> To get an idea of what was expected by the dial-
in server, the first command
> I ran was:
>
> /usr/sbin/pppd /dev/ttyS0 57600 debug connect
"/usr/sbin/chat -v '' AT OK
> ATDT1234567 CONNECT '\d\c'"
>
> This was in /var/log/ppp:
>
> Aug 25 21:57:51 localhost pppd[690]: pppd 2.3.7
started by root, uid 0
> Aug 25 21:57:52 localhost chat[691]: send (AT^M)
> Aug 25 21:57:52 localhost chat[691]: expect (OK)
> Aug 25 21:57:52 localhost chat[691]: AT^M^M
> Aug 25 21:57:52 localhost chat[691]: OK
> Aug 25 21:57:52 localhost chat[691]: -- got it
> Aug 25 21:57:52 localhost chat[691]: send
(ATDT1234567^M)
> Aug 25 21:57:52 localhost chat[691]: expect
(CONNECT)
> Aug 25 21:57:52 localhost chat[691]: ^M
> Aug 25 21:58:13 localhost chat[691]:
ATDT1234567^M^M
> Aug 25 21:58:13 localhost chat[691]: CONNECT
> Aug 25 21:58:13 localhost chat[691]: -- got it
> Aug 25 21:58:13 localhost chat[691]: send (\d)
> Aug 25 21:58:14 localhost pppd[690]: Serial
connection established.
> Aug 25 21:58:14 localhost pppd[690]: Using
interface ppp0
> Aug 25 21:58:14 localhost pppd[690]: Connect:
ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS0
> Aug 25 21:58:15 localhost pppd[690]: sent [LCP
ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
> <magic 0xa54acd7d> <pcomp> <accomp>]
> Aug 25 21:58:15 localhost pppd[690]: rcvd [LCP
ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1534>
> <asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth 0xc027 01 00 00 03 00
00 00 0e> <magic 0xc5fa16c4>
> <accomp> < 11 04 05 fe> < 12 02> < 13 09 03 00
01 cb f2 08 01>]
> Aug 25 21:58:15 localhost pppd[690]: sent [LCP
ConfRej id=0x1 <auth 0xc027
> 01 00 00 03 00 00 00 0e> < 11 04 05 fe> < 12
02> < 13 09 03 00 01 cb f2 08
> 01>]
> Aug 25 21:58:15 localhost pppd[690]: rcvd [LCP
ConfAck id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
> <magic 0xa54acd7d> <pcomp> <accomp>]
> Aug 25 21:58:15 localhost pppd[690]: rcvd [LCP
ConfReq id=0x2 <mru 1534>
> <asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth 0xc027 01 00 00 02>
<magic 0xc5fa16c4> <accomp>]
> Aug 25 21:58:15 localhost pppd[690]: sent [LCP
ConfRej id=0x2 <auth 0xc027
> 01 00 00 02>]
> Aug 25 21:58:15 localhost pppd[690]: rcvd [LCP
ConfReq id=0x3 <mru 1534>
> <asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth 0xc123 01 00 00 02>
<magic 0xc5fa16c4> <accomp>]
> Aug 25 21:58:15 localhost pppd[690]: sent [LCP
ConfRej id=0x3 <auth 0xc123
> 01 00 00 02>]
> Aug 25 21:58:15 localhost pppd[690]: rcvd [LCP
ConfReq id=0x4 <mru 1534>
> <asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth chap MD5> <magic
0xc5fa16c4> <accomp>]
> Aug 25 21:58:15 localhost pppd[690]: sent [LCP
ConfRej id=0x4 <auth chap
> MD5>]
> Aug 25 21:58:15 localhost pppd[690]: rcvd [LCP
ConfReq id=0x5 <mru 1534>
> <asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth pap> <magic
0xc5fa16c4> <accomp>]
> Aug 25 21:58:15 localhost pppd[690]: sent [LCP
ConfRej id=0x5 <auth pap>]
> Aug 25 21:58:15 localhost pppd[690]: rcvd [LCP
ConfReq id=0x6 <mru 1534>
> <asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth 0xc027 01 00 00 03 00
00 00 0e> <magic 0xc5fa16c4>
> <accomp>]
> Aug 25 21:58:15 localhost pppd[690]: sent [LCP
ConfRej id=0x6 <auth 0xc027
> 01 00 00 03 00 00 00 0e>]
> Aug 25 21:58:16 localhost pppd[690]: rcvd [LCP
ConfReq id=0x7 <mru 1534>
> <asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth 0xc027 01 00 00 02>
<magic 0xc5fa16c4> <accomp>]
> Aug 25 21:58:16 localhost pppd[690]: sent [LCP
ConfRej id=0x7 <auth 0xc027
> 01 00 00 02>]
> Aug 25 21:58:16 localhost pppd[690]: rcvd [LCP
ConfReq id=0x8 <mru 1534>
> <asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth 0xc027 01 00 00 02>
<magic 0xc5fa16c4> <accomp>]
> Aug 25 21:58:16 localhost pppd[690]: sent [LCP
ConfRej id=0x8 <auth 0xc027
> 01 00 00 02>]
> Aug 25 21:58:16 localhost pppd[690]: rcvd [LCP
ConfReq id=0x9 <mru 1534>
> <asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth 0xc027 01 00 00 02>
<magic 0xc5fa16c4> <accomp>]
> Aug 25 21:58:16 localhost pppd[690]: sent [LCP
ConfRej id=0x9 <auth 0xc027
> 01 00 00 02>]
> Aug 25 21:58:16 localhost pppd[690]: rcvd [LCP
ConfReq id=0xa <mru 1534>
> <asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth 0xc027 01 00 00 02>
<magic 0xc5fa16c4> <accomp>]
> Aug 25 21:58:16 localhost pppd[690]: sent [LCP
ConfRej id=0xa <auth 0xc027
> 01 00 00 02>]
> Aug 25 21:58:16 localhost pppd[690]: rcvd [LCP
ConfReq id=0xb <mru 1534>
> <asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth 0xc027 01 00 00 02>
<magic 0xc5fa16c4> <accomp>]
> Aug 25 21:58:16 localhost pppd[690]: sent [LCP
ConfRej id=0xb <auth 0xc027
> 01 00 00 02>]
> Aug 25 21:58:16 localhost pppd[690]: rcvd [LCP
TermReq id=0x1 02]
> Aug 25 21:58:16 localhost pppd[690]: sent [LCP
TermAck id=0x1]
> Aug 25 21:58:16 localhost pppd[690]: Hangup
(SIGHUP)
> Aug 25 21:58:16 localhost pppd[690]: Modem
hangup
> Aug 25 21:58:16 localhost pppd[690]: Connection
terminated.
> Aug 25 21:58:16 localhost pppd[690]: Connect
time 0.1 minutes.
> Aug 25 21:58:17 localhost pppd[690]: Exit.
>
> Based on that, I set up pap-secrets and chap-
secrets as:
>
> # Secrets for authentication using PAP
> # client server secret IP addresses
> fakeuser * fakepass *
>
> and
>
> # Secrets for authentication using CHAP
> # client server secret IP addresses
> fakeuser * fakepass *
>
> respectively, then ran:
>
> /usr/sbin/pppd /dev/ttyS0 57600 debug user
fakeuser connect
> "/usr/sbin/chat -v -t 20 '' ATDT1234567
CONNECT '' TIMEOUT 5 serid:--serid:
> fakeuser assword? fakepass"
>
> and got this in /var/log/ppp:
>
> Aug 25 22:04:38 localhost pppd[770]: pppd 2.3.7
started by root, uid 0
> Aug 25 22:04:39 localhost chat[771]: send
(ATDT1234567^M)
> Aug 25 22:04:39 localhost chat[771]: expect
(CONNECT)
> Aug 25 22:04:58 localhost chat[771]:
ATDT1234567^M^M
> Aug 25 22:04:58 localhost chat[771]: CONNECT
> Aug 25 22:04:58 localhost chat[771]: -- got it
> Aug 25 22:04:58 localhost chat[771]: send (^M)
> Aug 25 22:04:58 localhost chat[771]: timeout
set to 5 seconds
> Aug 25 22:04:58 localhost chat[771]: expect
(serid:)
> Aug 25 22:04:58 localhost chat[771]:
14400/ARQ/V34/LAPM/V42BIS^M
> Aug 25 22:05:03 localhost chat[771]: alarm
> Aug 25 22:05:03 localhost chat[771]: send (^M)
> Aug 25 22:05:03 localhost chat[771]: expect
(serid:)
> Aug 25 22:05:03 localhost chat[771]: @ Userid:
> Aug 25 22:05:03 localhost chat[771]: -- got it
> Aug 25 22:05:03 localhost chat[771]: send
(fakeuser^M)
> Aug 25 22:05:03 localhost chat[771]: expect
(assword?)
> Aug 25 22:05:07 localhost chat[771]: fakeuser^M
> Aug 25 22:05:07 localhost chat[771]: Password?
> Aug 25 22:05:07 localhost chat[771]: -- got it
> Aug 25 22:05:07 localhost chat[771]: send
(fakepass^M)
> Aug 25 22:05:07 localhost pppd[770]: Serial
connection established.
> Aug 25 22:05:07 localhost pppd[770]: Using
interface ppp0
> Aug 25 22:05:07 localhost pppd[770]: Connect:
ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS0
> Aug 25 22:05:08 localhost pppd[770]: Hangup
(SIGHUP)
> Aug 25 22:05:08 localhost pppd[770]: sent [LCP
ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
> <magic 0xfe3acbcd> <pcomp> <accomp>]
> Aug 25 22:05:08 localhost pppd[770]: write:
warning: Input/output error (5)
> Aug 25 22:05:08 localhost pppd[770]: Modem
hangup
> Aug 25 22:05:08 localhost pppd[770]: Connection
terminated.
> Aug 25 22:05:08 localhost pppd[770]: Connect
time 0.1 minutes.
> Aug 25 22:05:09 localhost pppd[770]: Exit.
>
> I did the"TIMEOUT 5" because, using minicom, I
saw that the dial-in server
> expects 2 <ENTER>'s before asking for Userid:
and I couldn't figure out how
> to send 2 <ENTER>'s any other way using CAHT
scripts except to send one,
> timeout, and send the second.
>
> Any help would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Multiple Intel Etherexpress Solved.(?)
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 1999 14:00:22 GMT
I'm taking the weird step of replying to my own post, 'cause I found an
answer to my question. (AN answer, not THE answer. There may be others.)
Seems that the Linux Router Project (www.linuxrouter.org) message
archive (search on "EtherExpress") describes the same problem I had
(viz., eexpress.o doesn't recognize 2 NICs), with an elegant solution.
Solution follows, and I quote:
"...
Basically, it seemed to me that the eexpress module was
only recognizing one of my two EtherExpress cards. I've tried
combos like
eexpress io=0x300,0x320
eexpress io=0x300,0x320 irq=10,11
eexpress irq=10,11 io=0x320,0x300
but they just didn't work.
What DID work, is:
eexpress irq=10 io=0x300
eexpress -o eexp1 irq=11 io=0x320
The second line loaded the eexpress module again under a different
name - "eexp1". When the second one loaded, it found the other
adapter without a hitch.
..."
This should be simpler than recompiling the kernel or fixing the driver,
and easier than buying a _different_ 2nd NIC.
Here's hoping the next guy has an easier time with this than I did.
Regards, Steve
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "Matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PPP error
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 1999 10:54:24 -0400
I recently upgraded one of my Linux boxes from RH 5.2 to RH 6.0, then
updated the kernel to ver. 2.2.12. This was the box I use as a gateway via
IPMasq, and now IPChains. After the upgrade I was getting the following
error in /var/log/messages when trying to establish a ppp connection :
Received bad configure-nak/rej: 03 06 cc ba 21 40
The connection would time out, then disconnect. This was working fine prior
to the upgrade. I've seen a few other posts with a similar message, but no
answers. The only other change I made was switching the dialout port from
/dev/cua1 to /dev/ttyS1. After switching back to the cua1 device the
connection completes without error. I was under the impression there was no
real difference between the devices, but that the cuaxx devs should not
really be used anymore. So, any idea what the problem is, and how I can get
it working using the ttySx devices ? TIA.
--
Matt
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 1999 23:35:25 -0400
From: trader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Browsers and Linux
Norman Levin wrote:
>
> I wonder where the 'custom' of answering after the
> question comes from? I've just be going thru some of
> my offline usergroups, and I've gone through a dozen
> appends that start with ">" and the same original
> question ... and I have to scroll down to see
> new stuff. If I'm really interested in the
> original append (and I can't remember if from
> the subject line), I can do that.
i dunno, but if you answer my question before i ask it, i'd find that a
bit ostentatious. i've been reading newsgroups since 1992, and i know
the "custom" goes back at least until then.
trader
--
The views expressed above are not necessarily those of anyone else on
the planet.
Email address spam protected; remove underwear to reply.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 1999 23:42:53 -0400
From: trader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Win98 -> Linux -> Internet
Steve Graham wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> The only experience I have with Linux is reading the www.linux.com web page.
>
> I am building a home network: 2 win9x PCs, and a server. Instead of
> upgrading my 486 machine to support Win NT4.x, and using Proxy server 2.0,
> so both PC's can access the internet via the LAN, I thought I might like to
> give Linux a try...
two things to watch out for if you use a 486 as your linux box:
1) does the bios allow you to set up the machine with one partition
larger than 503 mb? i wanted to put everything on my 3.2 gb hard drive
in one partition, but the bios wouldn't allow it, and i had to set up 4
partitions.
2) put the ip addresses of your win9x machines in the /etc/hosts file.
if you don't, it takes a long time to connect via telnet/ftp to the
linux box.
> What products will I need
i used redhat 5.0 and have not regretted it at all.
trader
--
The views expressed above are not necessarily those of anyone else on
the planet.
Email address spam protected; remove underwear to reply.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: rtl8139 modules for network cards - help
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 1999 13:23:39 GMT
Hello,
Does anyone have any practical experience of using the rtl8139.o
precompiled kernel modules (redhat 5.1)? I very new to networking so I
don't know that I have even got the driver installed and set up
correctly. Information on the following would be useful:
-How to isntall the module
-Once installed, how to check its funcionality / configure it
-A good place to look for information on the set up required on a win95
machine (dlink card) / linux box regarding ip addresses, hosts.conf
files etc.
Thanks
Ben Smither
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "GPusch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help
Subject: Problem getting direct serial PPP connection from WinNT to Linux
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 1999 16:40:29 +0200
Hi,
I'm having problems getting a direct serial (null modem) connection between
a
Win NT (client) and Linux box (server).
What I do is:
on the Linux box:
pppd -detach 19200 /dev/ttyS1 19200 crtscts lock
on the NT box:
start "Dial-Up Networking" with the direct serial line as a "modem"
(connection to another NT box works)
After that, on a serial line analyzer I see the garbage coming from
the Linux box. But no response from the NT box except the "word"
"CLIENT" repeated five times.
Then pppd stops and the NT box shows me an error message box.
Has anybody any idea how I can get the Linux box answer that "CLIENT"
message or how I can get the NT box to skip it and start sending LCP
packets ???
I know that between two Windows machines the server answers with
"SERVER" and after that LCP config packets are exchanged.
thanks for any help
G�nter
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Intel EEPro/10
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 1999 13:27:24 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Dean@Home" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> I've got two of those cards in my firewall
machine (486), and they both work
> fine with the stock Linux driver (eepro.o).
I've got what I think is a similar problem:
a gateway machine with two known-good EtherExpress
NICs at distinct addresses, RedHat 5.2, and no way
I can seem to make the eexpress.o driver recognize
both NICs. The suggestions in the Ethernet-HOWTO
on passing multiple args to the driver don't seem
to work on eexpress for some reason. If anyone has
made this driver work with 2 NICs, I'd really like
to know how you did it...
Regards, Steve
I
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "mms67" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.security,comp.protocols.smb
Subject: Alias user in Linux or Samba?
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 1999 11:54:46 -0400
Hello there. I have three quick questions:
1. Is it possible in Linux (or Unix in general) to have two different user
names that map to the same user ID? For example, to have user1 be equivalent
to root, so they have distinct user names but the same user ID (number)?
2. Is it possible in Samba to map a network user to a Linux user? In other
words, when the W98 user user1 logs into Samba, it is mapped to Linux root
(for example, besides whether this is a good idea or not). I thought
/etc/smbusers is designed for this (it has entries like "root =
Administrator operator"), and smbadduser modifies that file when a new user
is added with unixid:ntid, but it does not seem to work. I'm using Samba
with encrypted passwords, I'm not sure if this has any bearing on the
matter.
3. Is it possible to tell Samba to use Linux passwords for the network
passwords. It is quite inconvenient to keep two sets of passwords for each
user (in /etc/passwd and /etc/smbpasswd). Again, I'm using Samba with
encrypted passwords, I'm not sure if this has any bearing on the matter.
Linuxconf has a setting "Synchronize Linux and Samba passwords", but I'm not
sure what this does, it does not seem to be doing anything. I'm using RedHat
6.0, by the way.
Thank you.
------------------------------
From: Anders Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Which HOWTO
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 1999 15:09:31 GMT
I have a Linux box with two network interface cards. One of these will
connect to an adsl modem, and the other to a hub.
Which howto should I read? - firewall, proxy, masquerading, ip
chains ...
I only have a basic understanding of these terms, and would like the
easiest possible setup!
I use suse linux 6.1.
Thank you,
/Anders
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: ZYON <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: D-Link DFE 530-TX - not workin under RHL6
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 1999 13:31:12 GMT
The module fo the DLink DFE 530-TX is the via-rhine.o, you only need to do
the following: at any point of your system
modprobe via-rhine.o
Next, in /etc directory edit conf.modules and insert
alias eth0 via-rhine
Reboot you machine, and you should see some lines refering to your card,
it should work!!!
midknite wrote:
> most likely, your problem is that your netcard isn't an ne2000
> compatible card. I have one and discovered by looking at /proc/pci
> that it uses the VIA Rhine chipset, not an ne2k chipset.
> solution: recompile your kernel with support for rhine cards instead
> of ne2k cards.
>
> Radical wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> > I have a DLink DFE 530-TX on a PII350,32M running RedHat Linux 6.0,
kernel
> > 2.2.5.
> > I can' get this card workin. It works under Win98. But when i
try "modprobe
> > ne2k-pci.o" in linux it says something like "..card busy"..
> >
> > I tried "pnpdump" also..but it found nothing. Its base-addr accordin
to the
> > dos-based "diag"-nostic program - "D400h"..and irq = 11.
> > I have tried "modprobe" with other modules..i mean the "dlink"
ones...but no
> > help!.
> >
> > How can i setup this card??
> > Ne help wud b appreciable!
> >
> > Thanx
> > Radical
>
> --
> brian kowolowski
> gpg key / infos
http://www.cryogen.com/midknite/gpg.html
> gpg print: F6B6 076D 4BFC CD14 7C14 1A2F 61DA BDE5 7A88 D6C3
================== Posted via CNET Linux Help ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: Sahin Akkargan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: how to add second ethernet ???
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 1999 16:40:05 +0300
I would like to add a second ethernet interface in Turkuaz (REDHAT 6.0
Turkish Version), and set up the ipmasquering to connect the 30 Pc's to
ineternet,
eth0 -> 3com and kernel includes the necessary module.
eth -> NE2000 compitable , how to add the necessary module ?
and hoow to set up ipmasq in Redhat ??
------------------------------
From: "Rick Orwig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: sendmail not relaying external mail
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 1999 08:37:28 -0500
I had to start linuxconf and go to the mail setup area. There is a checkbox
that says something like Relay rules or something. I turned that on and
added our IP addresses into the relay allow by ip area.
For some reason I tried to restart sendmail but that didn't work so I
rebooted and that seemed to have solved my problem.
-Rick
Stephen Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> sendmail 8.9.3 will not relay external mail for me,
> i'm running RH6.0
> please do not send me a link to the sendmail how-to, or installation
> guide, i've tried everything that i've read and more.
> the mail is sent to the queue, but never leaves. (at one point in time i
> had it leaving the queue, but it still didn't get where it was goin' )
>
> if anyone has any ideas for me to try out, i'm all about tryin them out.
>
>
> thanks.
>
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://home.att.net/~sirbeck/
> http://sirbeck.dyndns.org/
> SirBeck on AIM
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PPP - Hung Modem
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 1999 13:25:16 GMT
I was setting up ppp on one of machines when I hung a Sportster 33.6
Faxmodem. The "tr" light stayed on and would not reset. I then took off
a Sportster 56k and triied to get it going when I hung it. The same
problem. Eventually I got the 33.6 unhung but an unable to get the ppp
to initialize. My setting I am sure are correct. My question is there a
modem command besides ATZ and AT&F to reset the modem?
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
