Linux-Networking Digest #497, Volume #10 Sun, 14 Mar 99 22:13:56 EST
Contents:
Re: Sextuple Boot (Forrest)
NFS Hack Attack ? (Daniel Bruce)
Re: dial up/ignore voice calls/# of rings ("Eleno Sandoval")
Re: After kernel 2.2.3 recompile: DHCP client problem ("James St.Cyr")
Re: For all you Nicrosoft lovers (Richard Steiner)
Re: EtherNet Card Problems (Ivo Naninck)
Re: NETGEAR (Colin Guillas)
sshd error in /var/log/syslog (kaos)
Re: Slow Telnet & FTP response (Don Heffernan)
Re: can't ping Linux --> win98 ("Eriksson")
Re: ADSL ?? (Richard Steiner)
Re: LAN and PPP Don't like one another (John Broadhead)
Re: HAVE I BEEN CRACKED? (Miguel Cruz)
Re: After kernel 2.2.3 recompile: DHCP client problem ("Wadels")
Trying to set up Cable Modem @home under linux...pings IP but nothing else????
(Jeremy M. Gibson)
Re: Rexec (Shane Powell)
Re: Sextuple Boot ("Martin Ozolins")
Re: Telnet mysteriously non-functional, refuses connections ([EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dave
Barter))
NFS vs Samba ("Xiao Furen")
Re: Not finding ethernet card (Thomas Lepkowski)
Re: 2 LAN Cards: delaying eth1 initialization (M. Buchenrieder)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Forrest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.security,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.networking,athome.users-win95,comp.os.netware.misc,comp.os.linux.help
Subject: Re: Sextuple Boot
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 14:00:49 -0600
You're right, NT's boot loader couldn't see the Linux partition on my
computer. However, to get it to work I had LILO install itself on the
Linux partition rather than the primary partition (it couldnt install on
the primary anyway because it's formatted NTFS). Then from within Linux
theres a way to pull the Linux boot off into a single file (bootsect.lnx).
There's documentation on the Linux CD about how to do this. Then just put
this file on the primary partition and add an entry in the boot.ini file
to load it.
later
Forrest
On Sun, 14 Mar 1999, it was written:
> Here's my two cents: System Commander will work. I believe LILO will do the
> trick too. I;m fairly certain that NT's boot loader is not going to see the
> Linux and SCO partitions.
>
> Forrest wrote in message ...
> >
> >Well, I don't think you necessarily need System Commander to boot multiple
> >operating systems. On my computer at work I have win95, NT4.0 and
> >Redhat5.0 and I was able to get them all to boot using the NT boot loader.
> >I just pick which operating system I want and away I go. I will say it
> >was a sleight headache to set up though because the primary partition on
> >my hardware is formatted NTFS, but its definitely workable.
> >
> >later
> >Forrest
> >
> >On 14 Mar 1999, David Efflandt wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 13 Mar 1999 19:12:48 GMT, william stewart
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > After having tried to install NT 4.0 on a slave drive by
> >> >switching the boot
> >> >sequence in an Award BIOS and finding out there is no way that I would
> >> >be able to
> >> >put a master boot record on a slave drive and after also switching which
> >> >was slave
> >> >and which was master, I have decided to buy a new cheap 300 MHz,4GB,64
> >> >RAM system and buy System Commander so that I can put NT4.0 on one
> >> >partition,NT 3.51 on another,SCO Unix on one,NetWare 3.12 on one,NetWare
> >> >4.11 on one and Red Hat 5.1 on another.
> >> >My question is: Will System Commnader actually be able to do this?
> >> > I understand all about the different files systems on different
> >> >partitions.
> >> >But does System Commander really able to put that many OSes on a Master
> >> >Boot record?
> >> > Any comments would be appreciated.
> >> >
> >> > Thank you, Will H. Stewart
> >>
> >> So, what's wrong with using LILO? I boot to 4 different systems on 3
> >> different IDE drives without having to change any jumpers. All the OS's
> >> do not go on the MBR, just pointers to where they are.
> >>
> >> LILO can boot to any drive that shows up in CMOS setup (in which case you
> >> can ignore the warnings). Just make sure that CD or other removable
> >> drives are last (especially if they do not show in CMOS).
> >>
> >> Of course I have no use for NT or Netware, so I don't have a clue if they
> >> boot any different from Win95.
> >>
> >> --
> >> David Efflandt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> http://www.xnet.com/~efflandt/
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
>
>
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 12:05:37 -0800
From: Daniel Bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: NFS Hack Attack ?
I was recently testing 2.2.3 Kernel. Soon after boot and ppp
connect, I get this on the log:
Mar 13 18:58:12 linux1 mountd[97]: Unauthorized access by NFS client
206.239.27.81.
Mar 13 18:58:12 linux1 mountd[97]: Unauthorized access by NFS client
206.239.27.81.
Mar 13 18:58:12 linux1 mountd[97]: [truncated] Blocked attempt of
206.239.27.81 to mount
^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^=
P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P=
^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^=
P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P=
^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^=
P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P=
^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^=
P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P=
^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^=
P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P=
^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^=
P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P=
^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P^P
Also the whois database is currently being updated for this subnet: (at
the time of this, there was no entry for the address)
whois 206.239.27.81
[rs.internic.net]
[No name] (RTV-HST)
Hostname: RTV.RTVAUGHN.COM
Address: 206.239.27.81
System: ? running ?
Record last updated on 14-Jul-98.
Database last updated on 14-Mar-99 09:13:23 EST.
whois 206.239.27.5
[rs.internic.net]
[No name] (CHODA-HST)
Hostname: CHODAK.DSIT.COM
Address: 206.239.27.5
System: ? running ?
Record last updated on 09-Jan-96.
Database last updated on 14-Mar-99 09:13:23 EST.
Any thoughts?
--
* --------------------------------------------------- *
* Daniel Bruce - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* http://www.mygen.com
* P.O. Box 7167 , Tahoe City Ca. 96145
* --------------------------------------------------- *
------------------------------
From: "Eleno Sandoval" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: dial up/ignore voice calls/# of rings
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 17:25:23 -0800
Here's my two cents. To answer on the 5th ring add "s0=5" to your init
string.
I don't know about the voice part of your question.
Good Luck.
Leno
Harry Park wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>
>I am using uu_getty(2.07j-3) for dialin connectivity to my Linux 5.1
>machine.
>I have 2 questions:
>
>Can I make uugetty ignore voice phone calls on the line? As it is now
>when
>someone calls the house the modem trys to talk. Useful for telepromoters
>but
>not for family members.
>
>How do I set the number of rings to 5 rings?
>
>Included is my /etc/conf.uugetty.ttyS2 file
>
>
>INITLINE=cua2
>ALTLOCK=cua2
>TIMEOUT=60
>INIT="" AT\r OK\r\n
>WAITFOR=RING
>CONNECT="" ATA\r CONNECT\s\A
>DELAY=1
>DEBUG=010
>
>TIA
>
------------------------------
From: "James St.Cyr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: After kernel 2.2.3 recompile: DHCP client problem
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 20:31:20 -0500
Wadels wrote:
> First, Redhat 5.2/dhcpcd worked great for me. Then I configured and
> installed kernel 2.2.3 and all the relevant RedHat 5.2 updates (esp. those
> for the new kernel). When I rebooted with it, the DHCP first could not find
> net-pf-17, but aliasing this to af_packet in conf.modules stopped that
> error. But...
>
> Now on bootup, dhcp sets my eth0 to 1, 2, 3 rx values, and gets an IP
> address but says that ifup timed out. Then it hangs for a long time before
> continuing. Afterwards, lynx works. The command "ifdown eth0" effectively
> takes the net down (good) but the command "ifconfig" still shows eth0.
>
> What's wrong? Help?
Did you apply the latest DHCPD? I upgraded yesterday from RH 5.2 (2.0.36) to
2.2.3 without any problems. I used :
http://charlotte.redhat.com/support/docs/rhl/kernel-2.2/kernel2.2-upgrade-html
as my guide. I have a 3C515 card linked into the kernel (no modules) without
any problems.
Jim
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Steiner)
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: For all you Nicrosoft lovers
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 18:03:51 -0600
Here in comp.os.linux.setup, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (doole) spake unto us, saying:
>"Rufus V. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> apparently said this:
>
>>The point is that sometimes innocent people need their privacy.
>
>From Authorities? Why??
What happens if that Authority decides to use your information in a
manner which harms you? Or if someone else steals that information
from that Authority?
Blind trust can be foolish.
--
-Rich Steiner >>>---> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>---> Bloomington, MN
OS/2 + Linux (Slackware+RedHat+SuSE) + FreeBSD + Solaris + BeOS +
WinNT4 + Win95 + PC/GEOS + MacOS + Executor = PC Hobbyist Heaven!
"Paid off"? What does that mean?"
------------------------------
From: Ivo Naninck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: Re: EtherNet Card Problems
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 21:24:39 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
> eth0 is a Linksys EtherPCI LAN Card II at irq 5, io 6100
> eth1 is a 3Com 3C905B (PCI) at irq 5, io 6000
>
Both at IRQ 5 ?????
--
Best regards, and don't let the bits byte!
Ivo Naninck.
~
~
:wq!
------------------------------
From: Colin Guillas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NETGEAR
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 15:44:41 -0500
Well, a hub is a hub, and they're all compatible with linux.
As for the network card, that's a bit tricky... just to be safe, I would only
buy ISA, and not PNP. Yes, I know there are people running PCI, and even I
myself am running a PNP NIC with the PNP turned off... but sometimes, it is not
possible to turn off PNP.
A (usually) sure bet is to call up 'Netgear' and ask if their cards are firstly
'linux' compatible (they may actually be able to answer this!) and if they say
that they don't know or not that they are aware of, ask them if it is NE2000
compatible. NE2000 is pretty much the standard for networking cards, although
linux does support others.
Joseph White wrote:
>
> HI ALL,
>
> I'm thinking of buying a four port hub and a couple of NIC's so I can
> setup a Linux server w/Samba.
> Netgear by Bay Networks has some good deals, but I don't know if their
> products work with Linux. I'm running Redhat 5.1 - Intel, I read the
> hardware list, but could not determine from the list if Netgear products
> were supported or not.
>
> If anyone has info on Netgear or any other economical solutions for a
> small home network, please let me know.
>
> Thanks
--
+----------------------------------------------------+
| Colin Guillas Ringmaster For Commodore Ring |
| http://welcome.to/cbmring [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
+----| ICQ#: 19683759 |-----| Ham Radio: VA3CSG |----+
------------------------------
From: kaos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: sshd error in /var/log/syslog
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 01:39:44 GMT
I've been getting the following error for the last few months in my
syslog:
fatal: Bind to port 22 failed: Transport endpoint is not connected
n e ideas whats going on?
thanks in advance
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Don Heffernan)
Subject: Re: Slow Telnet & FTP response
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 20:48:54 GMT
On Fri, 12 Mar 1999 02:20:14 -0000, "Ste" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Lill help needed.
>
>Currently have two Red Hat servers (1x5.1 & 1x5.2), connected to an ethernet
>LAN using 3com office connect hubs, and both have 3c509 nics.
>
>From a w'98 machine I can connect to them instantly using http, but telnet
>takes EXACTLY 1m 15 sec for the server to respond after connection and
>around the same time for FTP - using various clients.
>
>I have tried connecting to the same hub, from a different hub on the same
>segment and even telnetting from one server to the other... same result.
>
>The only thing that gets me is the connection is made within seconds but it
>takes so long for the prompts to be displayed on the client.
>
>Any clues ?
I had an identical problem and someone in this group explained that
ftp and telnet try to do reverse DNS lookups (I only experienced the
probelm when I was not connected outside my home LAN and thus had no
DNS). The suggestion - which worked fine - was to add entries for the
machines you are telnetting FROM to the hosts table.
Don Heffernan
------------------------------
From: "Eriksson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: can't ping Linux --> win98
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 03:05:19 +0100
>We'll have to check your network configuration now.
>if you run ifconfig on your linux box, you should get the settings back
from
>your network card (called eth0).
Yes. I do get some information about the eth0 interface.
>If you don't have an eth0 section, your card did not initialize (check
dmesg
>and various messages at startup).How is your network card on linux
>configured anyway?
Configured? Like the IP addresses or IRQ or..?
IP: 192.168.1.4 (the rest of the network has 1,2, and 3 as last digits)
netmask: 255.255.255.0 (use it (of course) all over the network)
broadcast: 192.168.1.255
IRQ: 10
I/O: e100
as for the route thing I use this address: 192.168.1.0
If I give the ifconfig -a command I get a "dummy" object as well. (Good or
bad?)
>If you have an eth0 section, check the params (same network address?) and
>the LED's (if there are led's on the NIC), esp. when you run ping on the
>linux box, something should flash. Also try to ping it's own ip on linux
My 3com 3c900 doesn't have any lights. If I ping the linux box itselft
(using IP 192.168.1.4) I get a "connection" (0.9 -0.5ms) which I have to
abort with ctrl-c. No problem.
One more thing. I've installed linux (Red Hat 5.2, kernel 2.0.36, (slackware
wouldn�t install =(( ) on one of the win98 comps. (IP: 192.168.1.3) (The one
I'm using right now btw) I tried to ping the other linux box.. no good.. But
that card does have some lights on it. I'll check they flash next time. I
haven't got around to ping any other comp on the network yet. I'll do that
tomorrow.
With that install I can eliminate any problems caused by the Windows
configuration
I got my share of fun today when I installed linux on my win98 comp without
loosing any data =))
>good luck
thanx a mill man!
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Steiner)
Subject: Re: ADSL ??
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 18:18:29 -0600
Here in comp.os.linux.networking, Derek Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
spake unto us, saying:
>Anyone know if you can use adsl modems??
It may depend on what you mean by an "ADSL modem", but external ones
like the Cisco 675 that USWest is using will interface with your PC
using a standard network card and a crossover cable.
It works fine here. :-)
--
-Rich Steiner >>>---> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>---> Bloomington, MN
OS/2 + Linux (Slackware+RedHat+SuSE) + FreeBSD + Solaris + BeOS +
WinNT4 + Win95 + PC/GEOS + MacOS + Executor = PC Hobbyist Heaven!
Why *AM* I doing this again?
------------------------------
From: John Broadhead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: LAN and PPP Don't like one another
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 15:21:43 -0700
Thomas Lepkowski wrote:
> Can somebody please help me with having a working ppp connection while
> at the same time have my LAN activated?
> I must deactivate ethx in order to first connect to URLs. The same
> happens to my LAN, if ppp is activated, I can't see, or move files
> to computers on the LAN.
> What should I do to make ppp and ethx like one another?
I had this same problem. What I found out is that if you already have a
default route going through your eth0 adapter, then pppd will not make a
default route, no matter what the command line parameters are.
What you need to do is remove the gateway and default route stuff from
your ethernet adapter's configuration.
-John Broadhead
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Miguel Cruz)
Crossposted-To: comp.security.unix
Subject: Re: HAVE I BEEN CRACKED?
Date: 15 Mar 1999 02:05:41 GMT
Joe Beiter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Ok how about this one:
>
>secure:
>--------------------
>Mar 9 03:04:52 xioa in.telnetd[711]: connect from 200.36.5.140
>Mar 9 03:05:02 xioa ipop3d[712]: connect from 200.36.5.140
>Mar 9 03:05:03 xioa in.telnetd[713]: connect from 200.36.5.140
>Mar 9 03:45:29 xioa in.telnetd[716]: connect from 200.36.5.140
>Mar 9 03:45:36 xioa ipop3d[717]: connect from 200.36.5.140
>Mar 9 03:45:37 xioa in.telnetd[718]: connect from 200.36.5.140
>----------------------
Garden-variety port scan. Report them to:
Podernet S.A. de C.V. (NETBLK-RED-PODERNET)
Loma Bonita 10 Col Lomas Altas.
Mexico CITY, DF 11950
MX
Netname: RED-PODERNET
Netblock: 200.36.0.0 - 200.36.31.255
Maintainer: PONT
Coordinator:
Duran, Eduardo (ED876-ARIN) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5 2570730
miguel
------------------------------
From: "Wadels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: After kernel 2.2.3 recompile: DHCP client problem
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 02:07:39 GMT
Thanks, I upgraded to dhcpcd-1.3.16-0.i386.rpm as instructed. That didn't
solve it, but thanks for trying. Any more ideas are greatly appreciated!
James St.Cyr wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>
>
>Wadels wrote:
>
>> First, Redhat 5.2/dhcpcd worked great for me. Then I configured and
>> installed kernel 2.2.3 and all the relevant RedHat 5.2 updates (esp.
those
>> for the new kernel). When I rebooted with it, the DHCP first could not
find
>> net-pf-17, but aliasing this to af_packet in conf.modules stopped that
>> error. But...
>>
>> Now on bootup, dhcp sets my eth0 to 1, 2, 3 rx values, and gets an IP
>> address but says that ifup timed out. Then it hangs for a long time
before
>> continuing. Afterwards, lynx works. The command "ifdown eth0" effectively
>> takes the net down (good) but the command "ifconfig" still shows eth0.
>>
>> What's wrong? Help?
>
>Did you apply the latest DHCPD? I upgraded yesterday from RH 5.2 (2.0.36)
to
>2.2.3 without any problems. I used :
>http://charlotte.redhat.com/support/docs/rhl/kernel-2.2/kernel2.2-upgrade-h
tml
>as my guide. I have a 3C515 card linked into the kernel (no modules)
without
>any problems.
>
>Jim
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeremy M. Gibson)
Subject: Trying to set up Cable Modem @home under linux...pings IP but nothing else????
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 01:57:56 GMT
So I read this RH5.2 and Cablemodem setup file out their on the net,
and it said that this was a very easy procedure. But I now have a eth0
device that will ping the assigned IP but nothing else. I am lost.
For debugging info this is what I have done:
System:
Dual boot Pentium II 333
2 Ethernet cards one for Windows (AT2400/BT PCI which I don't think is
supported in linux) and one for linux (3com 3c509b ISA).
Linux is 2.0.36 kernel and has all the networking packages.
Gen Info
LiLo detects the 3c509 and I have put it on irq 11 base 0x210
I have set up these things in netcfg:
name:ci419747-a
nameserver: 24.2.12.15
interfaces: eth0 IP(24.2.13.50) Default Gateway (24.2.13.1)
The following are some pipes from ifconfig and route:
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3584 Metric:1
RX packets:85 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:85 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:04:23:29:C0
inet addr:24.2.13.50 Bcast:24.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
##I was playing with alternate netmasks here###
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:24 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0
Interrupt:11 Base address:0x210
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref
Use Iface 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0
1 lo
24.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 3
eth0
#resolv.conf
search
nameserver 24.2.12.15
nameserver 24.2.12.17
#Supposed Correct configuration output
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3584 Metric:1
RX packets:161 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:161 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:04:23:29:C0
inet addr:24.2.13.50 Bcast:24.2.13.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:47 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0
Interrupt:11 Base address:0x210
#route
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref
Use
Iface
24.2.13.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0
1 eth0
127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0
3 lo
#tail /var/log/messages
[root@ci419747-a bin]# tail /var/log/messages
Mar 14 17:20:12 localhost kernel: eth0: 3c509 at 0x210 tag 1, 10baseT
port, address 00 50 04 23 29 c0, IRQ 11.
Mar 14 17:20:12 localhost kernel: 3c509.c:1.16 2/3/98
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mar 14 17:20:12 localhost kernel: eth0: Setting Rx mode to 1
addresses.
Mar 14 17:23:47 localhost kernel: Swansea University Computer Society
IPX
0.34 for NET3.035
Mar 14 17:23:47 localhost kernel: IPX Portions Copyright (c) 1995
Caldera,
Inc.
Mar 14 17:23:47 localhost kernel: Appletalk 0.17 for Linux NET3.035
Mar 14 17:26:52 localhost kernel: eth0: Setting Rx mode to 0
addresses.
Mar 14 17:31:10 localhost kernel: Swansea University Computer Society
IPX
0.34 for NET3.035
Mar 14 17:31:10 localhost kernel: IPX Portions Copyright (c) 1995
Caldera,
Inc.
Mar 14 17:31:10 localhost kernel: Appletalk 0.17 for Linux NET3.035
Thanks for any help
jeremy
------------------------------
From: Shane Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Rexec
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 01:58:24 GMT
I had a very similar problem with connecting our Win32 program to a RedHat
linux 5.2 system. Here is what I did to fix it.
Edit the file /etc/pam.d/rexec
and comment out the line:
auth required /lib/security/pam_securetty.so
I don't fully understand the reason behind this causing problems.
But it works for us.
Good luck.
>Background: My company has developed a DOS-based store and forward
>communications box. On one end FTP and REXEC are used to communicate
>with the server (using WatTCP). This system works "out of the box"
>when the server is running SCO, DG/UX, SunOS, and others but, alas,
>not with Linux. The Linux server knows about the DOS machine in its
>/etc/hosts (fully qualified domain entry), file and is listed in
>/etc/hosts.allow. Furthermore, 'shell' and 'exec' entries are both
>uncommented in inetd.conf and services. The appropriate user account
>is also set up.
>
>Problem: When attempting to connect via REX
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: "Martin Ozolins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.security,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.networking,comp.os.netware.misc
Subject: Re: Sextuple Boot
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 18:25:10 -0800
I use OS2 boot manager to boot the following:
NT40WKS
NT40SVR
Win95
OS2 v4
DOS 6.22 (For Gaming)
LINUX (for laughs)
DaZZa wrote in message ...
>On Sun, 14 Mar 1999, Forrest wrote:
>
>> You're right, NT's boot loader couldn't see the Linux partition on my
>> computer.
>
>It can - you just have to be a little tricky at making it work.
>
>My NT machine boots straight into Linux from the NT loader. No hassles, no
>problems.
>
>Email if you want the exact method.
>
>DaZZa
>
------------------------------
From: dave@<no spam>force9.co.uk (Dave Barter)
Subject: Re: Telnet mysteriously non-functional, refuses connections
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 07:12:51 GMT
My sympathies also !
In my case one telnet program on Win95 connects and then disconnects
immediately with the Linux box
The standard windows telnet does this first time and then works
perfectlt the next.
What I am after is a step by step flow of what happens when
establishing a telnet session in order that I can troubleshoot it
myself !!!
Dave
On Sun, 21 Feb 1999 17:47:08 GMT, "David Cook"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm experiencing a similar problem, although I at least get to the
>login/password prompts. I've seen this problem posted a number of times to
>this newsgroup, but the suggestions are always the same, which are to check
>the obvious (as you've also done). I'm sure the problem is really simple,
>but I've pretty much given up on it. I'm posting again partly to commiserate
>with you, but also in hopes that someone will, once and for all, enlighten
>us as to what the problem is with Telnet under Linux.
>
------------------------------
From: "Xiao Furen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: NFS vs Samba
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 07:04:57 +0800
I'd like to access my files in my linux across internet using Windows 98.
I've
tried Samba and it's great! However, it seems that Samba can only be used in
my
LAN environment instead of across the internet. Is there any solution for
this
or I have to use the NFS (or another protocol) instead?
------------------------------
From: Thomas Lepkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Not finding ethernet card
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 21:23:36 -0500
pallem wrote:
> Sombody help me.
>
> I'm new to linux world. I have two machines at home. I have Win98 on one and
> trying to install Linux Redhat 4.1 on other, and network these two machines.
>
> First I'm trying to configure linux machine with my own ipaddress (BTW:My
> machines are not connected to internet).
> When I do
> ifconfig -a
> It shows only loopback interface lo and not eth0 interface.
> During startup of linux I see a message
> "Delying eth0 initialization
> SIOCADDRT:Invalid argument"
>
> I added line
> append="ether=9,0x300,eth0" to lilo.conf and no improvement
>
> I have network cards on both the machines. I connected these two using
> X-over 10baseT cabel.
>
> I think linux is not finding my ethernet card.
>
> Please help me.
>
> Surya
Need more info.
What kind of ethernet card is installed? Plug and Play? ISA, PCI? What driver
are you using?
TML
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (M. Buchenrieder)
Subject: Re: 2 LAN Cards: delaying eth1 initialization
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 22:56:02 GMT
Denny Deng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Hi! Michael:
>There is no "eth0" if I do "ifconfig". I tried to access my 3com 509 for
>@home server.
>I installed Red Hat 5.0.
>Can you help me?
[...]
Well, you'll have to load a driver for the NIC first.
Michael
--
Michael Buchenrieder * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.muc.de/~mibu
Lumber Cartel Unit #456 (TINLC) & Official Netscum
Note: If you want me to send you email, don't munge your address.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
