Linux-Networking Digest #553, Volume #12 Sat, 11 Sep 99 16:13:35 EDT
Contents:
Re: ipchains and logging (Vlar Schreidlocke)
sound problems!!!!!! ("exploser")
Re: nic/pc problem (Jan Bernard van Doorn)
Re: sound problems!!!!!! (lou)
Re: 3com 3c905 generating frame errors... (Jan Bernard van Doorn)
Re: tulip IRQ woes & tulip-diag (Sean)
Re: RH 5.2 IP Masq Not Working (Carles Arjona)
Network LAN file transfers time out. ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
masquerading incoming http requests? (Jason Rosenberg)
Re: another @home/linux/network problem (Some Poster Guy)
Re: Home network, wingate, linux as proxy, etc. (Jason Rosenberg)
ipchains: forwarding packets HELP!!! (Ari Baum)
Problem in setting up PLIP connection... ("Leslie Cheng")
ADSL Ethernet Problem w/ nameserver (Kevin)
Re: Anyone can help with NIS Slave? (Jan Bernard van Doorn)
Re: Home network, wingate, linux as proxy, etc. (Jason Rosenberg)
Re: HELP! How to login and activate DSL????
Re: Tulip.c NIC Driver Compiling Problems ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: need help w/ dhcpcd & Cisco 675 ("Andrew H. George")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vlar Schreidlocke)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.security
Subject: Re: ipchains and logging
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 17:57:45 GMT
If you are looking for features to add check out Nukenabber for Win98.
It logs attempts and does a traceroute, finger, whois, etc. and
generates an intelligence report that can be used to pursue an
attacker further. It could also put some kind of blinking icon or make
a sound, etc. when an attempt was made.
On Sat, 11 Sep 1999 17:34:19 +0200, Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Alexander Dehm wrote:
>>
>> I know the log function in ipchains but now I have
>> two questions to you out there:
>>
>> 1. Is it possible to create a log file, that is more
>> detailed than the log in /var/log/messages ?
>I'm working on such a program right now. But that is not all it's gonna
>be able to to so it will take some time before I release it to the
>public :)
------------------------------
From: "exploser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.x,hk.comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: sound problems!!!!!!
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 01:14:13 +0800
I have set my soundcard by sndconfig, it work in the test and i have heard
Linus Torvald's sound!! but when i started the X-window, it does not show
any sound effect, even if i try to use X11amp,it failed to play any
MP3!!Why??Please help me to solve it!!!!!thx!!
------------------------------
From: Jan Bernard van Doorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: nic/pc problem
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 20:19:18 +0200
Sal wrote:
>
> I installed rh6.0 in my old pc pentium 90and then i installed a
> linksys 10/100 etherfast .But i just can't make it work.
Maybe you need a more recent tulip driver, see
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/tulip.html.
Cheers,
--jb
------------------------------
From: lou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.x,hk.comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: sound problems!!!!!!
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 18:31:40 +0000
exploser wrote:
> I have set my soundcard by sndconfig, it work in the test and i have heard
> Linus Torvald's sound!! but when i started the X-window, it does not show
> any sound effect, even if i try to use X11amp,it failed to play any
> MP3!!Why??Please help me to solve it!!!!!thx!!
For the sound FX to work you need to go to KDE Control Panel, than sound,
click on + sign click on System sounds. Than click the box to enable system
sound. Than reboot or restat x.
Lou
------------------------------
From: Jan Bernard van Doorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 3com 3c905 generating frame errors...
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 20:07:45 +0200
Steve Cowles wrote:
> Network Components:
> 3Com 12 port 100 MB hub, Model SuperStack II, HUB 100
You use a hub so both sides should be set to half duplex. Check the
linux machine with vortex-diag -a (by Donald Becker) to see if it is
mistakenly set to full duplex.
Cheers,
--jb
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 11:24:02 -0700
From: Sean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: tulip IRQ woes & tulip-diag
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I had trouble installing a Linksys 10/100 LAN NIC, so I downloaded the
> latest tulip.o (0.91g), and installed it, with no luck. I ran the
> tulip-diag program, and got this:
>
> tulip-diag.c:v1.12 7/31/99 Donald Becker ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> Index #1: Found a Lite-On 82c168 PNIC adapter at 0x1400.
> This chip has not been assigned a valid IRQ, and will not function.
> This must be fixed in the PCI BIOS setup. The device driver has no way
> of changing the PCI IRQ settings.
> Port selection is MII, half-duplex.
> Transmit stopped, Receive stopped, half-duplex.
> The Rx process state is 'Stopped'.
> The Tx process state is 'Stopped'.
> The transmit threshold is 72.
> Use '-a' to show device registers,
> '-e' to show EEPROM contents,
> or '-m' to show MII management registers.
>
> The 0x1400 is correct. How can I assign it a valid IRQ? In the BIOS, I
> can't turn off PNP, and all I can do for IRQs is reserve them for ISA
> devices (or would that help?) I know I have more than enough IRQs
> available, as I turned off the serial and parallel ports in BIOS. There
> are only two cards in the machine (and only 2 PCI slots). I took out
> the other card, and switched slots with the NIC, to no avail. Any help
> would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Jon
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
I dont know why you cannot assign an interrupt for your PCI slots in
your BIOS. Should be a line something like 'IRQ level for INTA pin'
under the PCI section. You might try contacting the manufacturer to find
out where this is, or to get an updated BIOS for your Motherboard.
Also, you may want to look at your boot messages 'dmesg | less' to see
what the kernel is finding in regards to your card. (If it didnt find
it, then the driver is not compiled correctly, either in the kernel
itself or as a module)
I dont know about the Tulip driver, but the vortex/boomerang driver I
compiled seems to find my 3c900b card with no problem, even if I have
INT9 turned off for that slot.
Sean
--
"Ambiguity succeeds where Honesty dares not venture" -Dogbert
------------------------------
From: Carles Arjona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: RH 5.2 IP Masq Not Working
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 19:36:32 +0200
Daniel Norton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ok, I've reviewed the FAQs/HOWTOs and they basically say that my RH 5.2
> should do IP masq out of the box, but -- you guessed it -- it's not
> working.
I'm using this script to start and stop masquerading on a working RH 5.2
Linux gateway (pre compiled 2.0.36-0.7 kernel):
---- Cut here ---------
#!/bin/sh
# masquerading This shell script takes care of starting and stopping
# IP masquerading.
# by Carles Arjona
LOCALNET=192.168.1.0
NETMASK=255.255.255.0
case "$1" in
start)
echo "Starting IP Masquerading "
# Uncomment the services you need.
/sbin/modprobe ip_masq_ftp
#/sbin/modprobe ip_masq_raudio
#/sbin/modprobe ip_masq_irc
/sbin/modprobe ip_masq_cuseeme
#/sbin/modprobe ip_masq_vdolive
/sbin/ipfwadm -F -p deny
/sbin/ipfwadm -F -a m -S $LOCALNET/$NETMASK -D 0.0.0.0/0
;;
stop)
echo "Stoping IP Masquerading "
/sbin/ipfwadm -F -d m -S $LOCALNET/$NETMASK -D 0.0.0.0/0
# or even /sbin/ipfwadm -F -f
for a in $( /sbin/modprobe -l ip_masq_* )
# It was:
# for a in /lib/modules/`uname -r`/ipv4/ip_masq_*
# but this didn't work on RedHat 5.2.
do
/sbin/modprobe -r `basename $a`
done
;;
*)
echo "Usage: masquerading {start|stop}"
exit 1
esac
exit 0
---- Cut here ---------
Since i have a dial-up connection, i added this line:
/usr/local/sbin/masquerading start
to my /etc/ppp/ip-up.local script, and this one:
/usr/local/sbin/masquerading stop
to my /etc/ppp/ip-down.local script.
Also make sure that IP forwarding is enabled. If
grep FORWARD /etc/sysconfig/network
reports "FORWARD_IPV4=false" then change it to "FORWARD_IPV4=true" and
restart the network devices:
/etc/rc.d/init.d/network restart
More info at:
http://www.tor.shaw.wave.ca/~ambrose/
http://www.xos.nl/linux/ipfwadm/paper/
Also check if routes are properly configured.
Regards.
Carles Arjona [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Please, just remove the second NOSPAM for replies from newsgroups.
(Yes, NOSPAM is my real username)
[Don't send me e-mail copies of usenet postings, please]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Network LAN file transfers time out.
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 19:04:50 GMT
Greetings.
I have a Slackware 2.0.35 server running Samba, FTP, Masqing (cable
modem) and Web server all successfully. However during a sustained
file transfer the LAN network seems to time out. Win98 reports "the
network resource is nolonger available" and during a FTP session the
transfer just halts. This generally occures after 1 minute of file
transfer.
I just noticed this problem (coincided with a P120 to P200 cpu
upgrade). Is there a switch or parameter that may solve this?
Hardware issue?
Befor I attack this problem I would appreciate any ideas and
suggestions. Thank you in advance.
------------------------------
From: Jason Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: masquerading incoming http requests?
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 19:11:38 GMT
I have asked this question indirectly as part of several
other posts, but can't seem to get much interest.
So I'll try to be a bit more direct here.
I want to have a web-server running on a machine on my
internal net which doesn't have an official external IP address.
Is this possible.
I haven't seen anything indicating it would be possible from
any of the HOWTO's and various linux documentation I've seen so far.
What I am thinking would be necessary would be a way to route incoming
http packets to the internal server. Is this possible.
Essentially, it would require the firewall system to be checking incoming
http packets, and to forward them to the appropriate internal system
based on the URL, using packet masquerading.
Is this reasonable, has it been done, what are the issues, etc.?
Jason
------------------------------
From: Some Poster Guy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: another @home/linux/network problem
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 11:15:12 -0700
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually, I've verified that to be not true. I've floated my cable
modem between at least 2 different boxes and 2 different network cards
and, as long as the hostname is set right, DHCP works fine.
On Sun, 04 Jul 1999 15:42:22 GMT, Travis Dixon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Larry Irons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> You might say that as I can just use a static address I haven't really
>>> got a problem but it's very convenient for me to use DHCP to
>>> automatically determine the PC's location fromthe network it's on.
>>>
>>> Do TCI@home use a strange type of DHCP that Linux doesn't know about?
>>> I've heard rumours about this (WIDE DHCP?) but nothing helpful.
>>>
>
>POssibly the DHCP leases are only handed out to known MAC addressess?
>If the Wondoze box and Linux box are different (well, unsing different' NIC's)
>then @home's DHCP server might not be recognizing it.
>
------------------------------
From: Jason Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Home network, wingate, linux as proxy, etc.
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 19:00:22 GMT
Can you point me to the source for sygate? I'd like to look at it...
Jason
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I suppose wingate will work ok given you give it the appropriate IP
> subnet mask and dns info. I have a cable modem too running on sygate
> "like" wingate but I like it better:" everything works fine I can
> connect to the internet retrieve e-mail. the only thing I cant do is
> log on to my unix box from the outside "very good firewall" I cant
> even get past it.
>
>
------------------------------
From: Ari Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ipchains: forwarding packets HELP!!!
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 19:28:05 GMT
I've been dealing with a variation of this for a long long time, I need
help to resolve it.
I'm now running 2.3.0 with the ipchains software.
I'm setup with a cable modem to a linux box, then back out to an
internal network with a second card.
if I want anyone that calls up my ip address on a browser to be
redirected to another machine on my internal network, how do I do it?
I've got my Linux firewall server as 192.168.1.8
An internal machine is 192.168.1.5 running a Win95 web server
I figure it's something like:
ipchains -A input -s 0.0.0.0/0 -p tcp -d 192.168.1.8 80 -j REDIRECT
192.168.1.5 80
but I just can't figure it out. Any help ASAP would be much appreciated.
Oren Baum
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Leslie Cheng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Problem in setting up PLIP connection...
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 19:36:24 GMT
Hi, I'm trying to setup a PLIP connection between a existing Linux PC to
brand new laptop. Because my laptop don't have CDROM drive, that's why I
want to install Linux to my laptop through PLIP accessing my PC CDROM drive.
So, I type in the following commands in my Linux PC:
mount -r /dev/cdrom /mnt/cdrom
/etc/rc.d/init.d/lpd stop
/sbin/rmmod lp
/sbin/insmod plip
I got an error message right after the last command:
/lib/modules/2.2.5/net/plip.o: init_module: Device or resource busy
Did I miss something or do something wrong?
Leslie
------------------------------
From: Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ADSL Ethernet Problem w/ nameserver
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 19:31:16 GMT
I have a dual boot Red Hat linux/win98 system. My ADSL service is through
southwestern bell. Once I connected the ant and ethernet card to my
computer, in win98 it was just a matter of putting in the right driver for
the ethernet card to connect to the internet. I did not have to enter any
gateways, masks, ip addresses, nameservers, etc in win 98 to connect to
the internet. I just used obtain IP address automatically and use DHCP for
WINS resolution, and have DNS disabled.
In linux, I don't even know if my card is working. I can ping my own
address 127.0.0.1, but I don't know if I am connected to the network. When
I try to run netscape, it says something about a $SOHO nameserver problem.
My ISP gives me no information about nameservers, masks, hosts or
addresses, and I didn't need this info to connect under win98.
1. How can I find out if my ethernet card is being properly detected
and initialized in linux?
2. I have checked many of the howto's and they all seemed to be telling me
to put in IP addresses for all these different servers. How do I get
connect to internet without knowing any addresses?
Your help is appreciated,
Kevin
================== Posted via CNET Linux Help ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: Jan Bernard van Doorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Anyone can help with NIS Slave?
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 20:57:07 +0200
Upgrade to ypserv-1.3.7
Cheers,
--jb
------------------------------
From: Jason Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Home network, wingate, linux as proxy, etc.
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 18:58:40 GMT
Scott,
I have spent a lot more time looking, since my previous reply.
It still looks like there is no way to use ipchains or ipmasquerading
to route incoming http packets to a node on the internal net.
Have you heard of anyone doing such a thing?
Jason
Scott Nolde wrote:
>
> Informative, but not out of date. ipchains can act as a firewall and
> block/redirect ports. You can also use squid to act as a proxy server.
>
> Look further...
> - Scott
>
> Jason Rosenberg wrote:
> >
> > Scott,
> >
> > I looked at the various HOWTO's, they seem informative, yet
> > out of date.
> >
> > One question I have regards being able have a web-server,
> > which in my particular case must run on Windows NT, and
> > have it be available externally, and yet have that system
> > still be hidden behind the firewall. Do such solutions
> > exist?
> >
> > That was why I was thinking that I would need to have
> > my proxy server be the NT machine.
> >
> > Jason
> >
> > Scott Nolde wrote:
> > >
> > > In the simplest terms, Linux does not restrict how many clients you have
> > > masquerading behind the gateway IP address. Linux has firewall
> > > services, too. Please look into Linux before buying Wingate. It could
> > > save you several bucks. Plus Linux is 'free' or very inexpensive.
> > >
> > > Linux is an ideal solution for your needs. Inexpensive and simple to
> > > implement.
> > >
> > > Also, look into the HOWTO's in the Linux Documentation Project:
> > > mirror site: http://www.cc.gatech.edu/linux/LDP/
> > >
> > > - Scott
> > >
> > > Jason Rosenberg wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I am interested in setting up a home network.
> > > > Currently, I have a single Windows NT machine,
> > > > connected to a cable modem. I am looking at
> > > > expanding things, so that I will have a second
> > > > NT workstation, an NT laptop (which will come
> > > > and go), and eventually a linux system.
> > > >
> > > > I have been looking at using WinGate to access the
> > > > cable modem from anywhere on the local net. I am
> > > > wondering if linux (and other Unixes, Macs, for that matter),
> > > > will work as clients to the wingate server, which will
> > > > be one of the NT systems. The WinGate home page doesn't
> > > > seem to indicate much support for varied client os support,
> > > > but I am wondering whether it will work anyway.
> > > >
> > > > I am looking at WinGate since it has been highly recommended,
> > > > and it seems easy to install and use, and it has firewall
> > > > capabilities.
> > > >
> > > > Naturally, I am also interested in knowing what linux has to
> > > > offer in terms as acting as my proxy server and fire-wall.
> > > > I'm not too educated on linux to date, but I do have extensive
> > > > experience with other flavors of unix.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for any info,
> > > >
> > > > Jason
> > >
> > > --
> > > ------------------------------------------------
> > > Scott Nolde
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > ------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------
> Scott Nolde
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: HELP! How to login and activate DSL????
Date: 11 Sep 1999 20:01:08 GMT
Hello,
Thanks for your reply! USWest uses DHCP to assign my IP. The problem
I'm having is that I have to use Cisco Commander to "login" and activate my
DSL line when I want to use it--my DSL line isn't active all the time (DSL
is new to my area, so they don't offer full time 24hr access yet). When I
use commander to login to USwest and activate my DSL, I have 2 hours of
use, then I'm disconnected automatically. I then have to reconnect to get
back on the net, etc. The login procedure seems similar to a modem dialup
PPP account. What I can't figure out how to do is to connect and activate
my DSL line under Linux since Cisco Commander is a Windows app. (maybe WINE
will work?) Even if it did connect and activate my DSL line using DHCP upon
bootup, I'd have to reconnect somehow after 2 hrs. One thing that is
interesting, is that DHCP works without logging in, because windows uses
this and gets an IP, Gateway, etc, upon bootup without me having to use
Cisco Commander. But I have no real net access until I run Commander, and
then only for 2 hrs each time I login.
Any ideas on how I might be able to "login" to activate my DSL line
under Linux? Do you somehow have to login to BellSouth to get net access,
or once you boot using DHCP are you always on the net? The later is the
type of DSL package I wanted, but as I mentioned, they don't offer 24/7
DSL lines here yet.
Thanks again for your reply!
In comp.os.linux.networking Hal Burgiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10 Sep 1999 09:41:12 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Hello,
>> I've got DSL through US West, both the line and as my internet provider.
>>Because my area is new to DSL, I was only able to sign up for something
>>called the "select" program, meaning that I have to use Cisco Commander to
>>login to my provider, which then gives me net access for 2 hours. After 2
>>hours expire, I must reconnect if I wish to get back on the internet.
>>Everything works well under Windows. Now I'd like to use Linux.
>>Unfortunately there isn't a Linux version of Cisco Commander...
>> Does anyone know of a way that I can login to US West under Linux? If I
>>login via Windows and reboot to Linux, everything works fine for 2 hours,
>>then I must reboot to windows, login again, then go back to linux. This is
>>tedious and not a desirable solution because of the 2hr DSL time limit until
>>I must login again.
>> Inside my machine is a 3com 3C905 ethernet card. This plugs into my
>>external Cisco 675 router.
>>
>>Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
>>
> I don't know about USWest, but I do this with BellSouth. Do you know the
> protocol they use to assign IPs? Good chance its DHCP. Is there a static
> IP instead? Which distro?
> DHCP is pretty easy to setup. On RH6, all I had to do was start
> 'netcfg', select interface 'eth0', select protocol 'dhcp', and 'start on
> boot', then hit 'activate' button. DHCP does all the negotiation based
> on the MAC address of the NIC which they already have. If you use RH6,
> get the 'pump' update first.
> --
> Hal B
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --
> Linux helps those who help themselves
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tulip.c NIC Driver Compiling Problems
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 18:35:28 GMT
Try insmod tulip.o debug=1 options=0,0
Make sure you remove the old tulip.o first.
Nina
On Thu, 09 Sep 1999 01:06:20 GMT, "Y. T. Chow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Just to let everyone know, I was able to compile the tulip.c (v.0.91g) file
>once I got a little guidance on my syntax errors. The areas that I tripped
>up on are as follows:
>
>1. The underscores before and after "KERNEL" are double underscores, not
>single.
>2. "O6" is the letter O followed by 6, not zero followed by 6.
>3. The little "`" symbols are not apostrophes but ticks (the key to the left
>of the number 1 key on a U.S. keyboard).
>
>gcc -DMODULE -D__KERNEL__ -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O6 -c tulip.c `[ -f
>/usr/include/linux/modversions.h ] && echo -DMODVERSIONS`
>
>(The above compile command is for tulip.c [v.0.91].)
>
>Once I used the correct syntax, the tulip.c file compiled and a tulip.o file
>got created. However, I still can't make my SOHOware fast ethernet NIC
>work -- I think. I followed the manufacturer's (NDC) instructions
>explicitly and tried their v.0.90 and the latest v.0.91. Maybe it's not a
>hardware problem but a network configuration error?
>
>Is there a diagnostic to determine if Linux recognizes and can use the NIC
>without pinging another PC on the LAN?
>
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Andrew H. George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: need help w/ dhcpcd & Cisco 675
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 19:13:43 GMT
can you tell me if you find out???
Thanks,
Andrew
Andy Halper wrote:
> I'm trying to get DHCP working between a Red Hat 6.0 box w/ 3Com 3c900B
> and a Cisco 675 DSL modem. From the monitor light behavior, I think the
> Cisco 675 is operating in bridged mode, although I haven't been able to
> login to the command port to verify yet. The PWR, LAN, and WAN lights
> are all stable. There appears to be periodic activity on the ACT light.
>
> The daemon startup scripts cause some activity on the WAN and LAN link
> lights, but timeout after one minute and fail.
>
> The most informative error messages I've been able to find thus far are
> things like:
>
> Sep 9 21:27:03 localhost dhcpcd[664]: timed out waiting for a valid
> DHCP server response
> Sep 9 21:32:28 localhost dhcpcd[676]: timed out waiting for a valid
> DHCP server response
> Sep 9 21:34:09 localhost dhcpcd[679]: timed out waiting for a valid
> DHCP server response
>
> in /var/log/messages when I try to start dhcpcd manually.
>
> Any help is greatly appreciated.
>
> Also, could someone point me to the most appropriate HOWTO for using
> minicom to login to the command port of the Cisco 675 over a serial
> connection? Should I be using the Serial-HOWTO or something else?
>
> Thanks,
> Andy Halper
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
