Linux-Networking Digest #557, Volume #12 Sun, 12 Sep 99 01:13:28 EDT
Contents:
Dialing into a linux box. ("Simon Chambers")
Re: ifconfig question (Clifford Kite)
Dialing into a linux box. (Kari Suomela)
Re: Dialing into a linux box. ("Simon Chambers")
Re: Linux\UNIX to Windows 9x and NT (Fedro)
Ipforwarding issues AND wuFTPD question ("Kamalov")
Terminals (Mladen Gavrilovic)
Re: ifconfig question (Michael Starkie)
help!!! with 3com EtherLink PCI III/XL ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Dialing into a linux box. (Kari Suomela)
Re: Using redir to expose a web-server behind firewall? (Bernd Eckenfels)
Creating a ppp dial in server to my network (Oliver Batchelor)
Re: mount: RPC: Program not registered? (William B. Cattell)
Bogus ppp device after kernel upgrade? ("G. Georgiev")
Eicon Diva ISDN T/A, RH6.0, ppp0 never comes up (Tom Treder)
Re: Bogus ppp device after kernel upgrade? (Clifford Kite)
Re: Losing interest (Tilman Kranz)
Re: cable modem can't ping gate way (KevinDTimm)
Re: Browsers and Linux (Jeremy Crabtree)
Re: mount: RPC: Program not registered? (PseudoTensor)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Simon Chambers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Dialing into a linux box.
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 02:14:49 +0100
Here's my problem, I want people to be able to dial into my machine, and
access it remotely via modem, unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be a
readily available daemon which is well documented that allows me to do so.
If anybody could help me find a daemon, preferably in tarball format, but
not essential.
Many thanks
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: ifconfig question
Date: 11 Sep 1999 20:10:09 -0500
Michael Starkie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> My default route is through my ehternet device ( eth0 ). When I want
> to connect to a private network using ppp, I must bring down my ehternet
> device so that my ppp device ( ppp0 ) is used as a default device. Must
> I do this? I can't ping any IP address inside the private network until
No, I think what you need to do is to remove the pppd defaultroute
option and use /etc/ppp/ip-up to create a network route for the private
network through the PPP interface. For example if the private network
is 192.168.0.0/24 and the PPP interface is ppp0 then
/sbin/route add -net 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 ppp0
in /etc/ppp/ip-up configures a specific network route for the private
network through the ppp0 interface. When the PPP interface is taken
down at the end of the connection then poof, the route disappears. You
get to keep the default route to the Internet at all times.
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* On occasion you'll run into an attidude on usenet. They contribute
nothing, but vitriolicly criticize those that do. Instead of reasoned
argument and facts they belittle, demean, and ridicule, relishing the
replies that this generates. Please do not feed the attidudes. */
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kari Suomela)
Subject: Dialing into a linux box.
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 01:30:21 GMT
Sunday September 12 1999 02:14, Simon Chambers wrote to All:
SC> Here's my problem, I want people to be able to dial into my
SC> machine,
SC> and access it remotely via modem, unfortunately, there doesn't
SC> seem to
SC> be a readily available daemon which is well documented that allows
SC> me
Sure there is: mgetty+sendfax
KS
------------------------------
From: "Simon Chambers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Dialing into a linux box.
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 02:44:21 +0100
Kari Suomela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:GED37DAC9A8@ks%karicobs.com...
>
> Sunday September 12 1999 02:14, Simon Chambers wrote to All:
>
> SC> Here's my problem, I want people to be able to dial into my
> SC> machine,
> SC> and access it remotely via modem, unfortunately, there doesn't
> SC> seem to
> SC> be a readily available daemon which is well documented that allows
> SC> me
>
> Sure there is: mgetty+sendfax
>
> KS
>
>
>
Cheers, do I place this in the inittab file in /etc/ ? or do I place it
somewhere else?
------------------------------
From: Fedro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux\UNIX to Windows 9x and NT
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 02:31:15 GMT
I am posting from a redhat 6.0 box behind a MS Proxy Server 2.0 NT machine,
As posted in previous replies The Proxy stuff goes simply by installing the
proxy server on the NT box (if this could be considered simple) and
configure both Win and Linux Workstation to use the proxy server. There was
I time where I used WinGate 2.0 as well.
This worked fine for HTTP but I have not been able to set it up right for
other protocols (FTP and the like).
For the WinNT browsing stuff I have configured samba to share the NT style
but I still have some trouble to make it work without problems (That is the
reason I was browsing this site).
To de guy that posted here, could you be so gentle to be a little bit more
specific about the configuration of the Linux Box behind the proxy?
Thanks,
Fedro.
withheld wrote:
>
> nice one.
> done this.
>
> connected 1 ultra sparc, 1 linux, 1 mac, 1 nt 5 ( win2000), and 1 win98
> modem in here)
>
> grab an internet gateway software, such as Wingate from the web. Install
it
> on the win98 machine.
> set the software to act as a proxy server to the other machines.
>
> tell the others to get their information from the proxy, set dial on
demand
> etc..
>
> now all machines even the host win98 machine will use the proxy data
first.
> if the proxy does not hold the data then the gateway software will
connect
> to your isp and update its cache.
>
> all machines can get email etc..
>
> HTH
>
>
>
> Michael Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Here's a very good question it's very direct........ Could anyone tell
me
> > how to share an internet connection with Windows NT being the the
default
> > gateway. I also need to know how Linux\UNIX can share files with Win9x
> > and NT. I have S.U.S.E. Linux 6.1 and I'm trying share files between
the
> > Linux and Win9x and NT if the internet sharing plan fails.........
> >
> > ------------------ Posted via CNET Linux Help ------------------
> > http://www.searchlinux.com
>
>
================== Posted via CNET Linux Help ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: "Kamalov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Ipforwarding issues AND wuFTPD question
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 22:40:52 -0400
Hello everyone,
I am wondering if you guys can help me out with this problem.
1. I have two computers (Comp1 and Comp2, both RedHat 6.0) and a cisco
router.
Comp2 is a dual home machine with ipforwarding enabled (eth0 192.168.1.3 and
eth1 192.168.2.1). I can ping from Comp1 (192.168.1.1) both interfaces on
Comp2 but not the router (192.168.2.2). From the cisco router I also can
ping both interfaces of Comp2 but not Comp1. I added the route in Cisco
router directing to reach the network 192.168.1.0 via 192.168.2.1 (eth1 of
Comp2) but no avail so far. I don't what is the issue here. Is it cisco
router not knowing how to get back to Comp1 or Comp2 not forwarding packets?
I also added a route to 192.168.2.0 network on Comp1 but so far it failed.
On tcpdump from Comp1 to cisco router it shows that Comp1 is trying to reach
cisco router but failing to reach which I think indicates that it is a Comp2
issue.
2. Is there any way I can lock up ftp'ed users to their home directory so
they can't browse or list other directories under wuFTPD (RedHat 5.2 bundle)
?
Guys, any help WILL BE APPRECIATED! I'll be even more appreciative if you
could reply directly to me.
Thanks a lot to all.
Alex
------------------------------
From: Mladen Gavrilovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Terminals
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 22:11:56 -0400
Hello,
I have a question about connecting dumb terminals to a computer running
Linux. Say I have a Pentium, and a 386. I've been told that I can set
up the 386 so it uses the Pentium's hardware when it executes programs.
Is this possible, and how far does it go? For example, if I have a
Voodoo card on my Pentium, can I get accelerated output on the 386? I
ask because I read somewhere that with a GLX renderer you could
theoretically output accelerated video to a Sun. So can this be done
over a network? It seems to me that it would require quite a bit of
bandwidth, as the PCI bus does something like 128 megs a second, I
think. So would I need 100 Megabit networking or something to do this?
Regards,
Mladen
------------------------------
From: Michael Starkie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: ifconfig question
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 22:44:19 -0400
Clifford Kite wrote:
> Michael Starkie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > My default route is through my ehternet device ( eth0 ). When I want
> > to connect to a private network using ppp, I must bring down my ehternet
> > device so that my ppp device ( ppp0 ) is used as a default device. Must
> > I do this? I can't ping any IP address inside the private network until
>
> No, I think what you need to do is to remove the pppd defaultroute
> option and use /etc/ppp/ip-up to create a network route for the private
> network through the PPP interface. For example if the private network
> is 192.168.0.0/24 and the PPP interface is ppp0 then
>
> /sbin/route add -net 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 ppp0
>
What about domain name services? Right now I have two /etc/resolv.conf
files one for the internet and the other for the private network (
/etc/resolv.conf.default && /etc/resolv.conf.private ). I manually copy the
appropriate file to /etc/resolv.conf before connection establishment. How can
I configure my DNS list to include all domain name servers in both networks
if I am to use both networks simultaneously?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: help!!! with 3com EtherLink PCI III/XL
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 02:33:22 GMT
I am trying to intall linux on a Dell OptiPlex GX1 which comes with
a 3Com Fast Etherlink card. I have compiled the kernel with the driver
for the card (or so I think) 3c59x.c but on booting I get the following
messages:
3c59x.c:v0.99H 11/17/98 Donald Becker
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/vortex.html
A 3Com network adapter is powered down! Setting the power state
0003->0000.
Setting the IRQ to 0, IOADDR to 0x5800.
The PCI BIOS has not enabled the device at 0/112. Updating PCI command
0000->0005.
eth0: 3Com 3c905B Cyclone 100baseTx at 0x5800, 00:50:04:7e:fb:41, IRQ 0
*** Warning: IRQ 0 is unlikely to work! ***
8K byte-wide RAM 5:3 Rx:Tx split, autoselect/Autonegotiate interface.
MII transceiver found at address 24, status 786d.
MII transceiver found at address 0, status 786d.
Enabling bus-master transmits and whole-frame receives.
eth0: Overriding PCI latency timer (CFLT) setting of 0, new value is 32.
could anyone give me suggestions?
thanks in advance
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kari Suomela)
Subject: Dialing into a linux box.
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 02:30:23 GMT
Sunday September 12 1999 02:44, Simon Chambers wrote to Kari Suomela:
>> Sure there is: mgetty+sendfax
>>
SC> Cheers, do I place this in the inittab file in /etc/ ? or do I
SC> place
SC> it somewhere else?
I run it from /etc/rc.d/rc.local
KS
------------------------------
From: Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Using redir to expose a web-server behind firewall?
Date: 12 Sep 1999 02:10:19 GMT
Jason Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It sounds like I would be limited to having only 1 web-server machine
> behind the firewall, if the convention is that 80 is always used for
> webservers, and if I can only redirect based on port number. I could
> only ever be redirecting to 1 webserver. Which is ok, for now, but
> may become a restriction later....
You can use a reverse proxy, I think TIS http-gw and squid can support the
remapping of incoming requests to different servers (based on host and local
part of the URL). You can of course use multiple port numbers and give them
in the URL (http://gate.mydoma.in:81/). And you can map multiple ip
addrsses, if you can get more than one from your provider. I dont suggest
you use redir since it is rather slow.
Greetings
Bernd
------------------------------
From: Oliver Batchelor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Creating a ppp dial in server to my network
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 15:38:38 +1200
I would like to be able to create a dial in server to my network via the
modem on my linux machine. I would like windows machines to dial in and
allow them to access the ip numbers on my network(192.168.0.x) and to
assign them an ip address like that.
I have it up and working with the network and can dial in my isp (setup
with pppsetup)
I use slackware 3.6 (kernal 2.0.35)
Does anyone know how to do this or could give where to find detailed
information on how to do this ?
thanks,
Oliver Batchelor
------------------------------
From: William B. Cattell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: mount: RPC: Program not registered?
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 02:56:06 GMT
On Thu, 09 Sep 1999, Douglas Nichols wrote:
>Would someonne tell me whaqt this means?
>
>
>Thanks
>--
>Cheers, dn
>
>Douglas Nichols [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>---------------------------------------------------------------
>National Wilms Tumor Study Group 206.667.4283
>Seattle, WA
Doug - Take a look at the NFS HOWTO. It goes over this message in there.
Bill
------------------------------
From: "G. Georgiev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Bogus ppp device after kernel upgrade?
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 23:43:33 -0400
Hi,
I did move to kernel 2.2.11 from 2.0.30 and the ppp connection I
have on this PC to another one of my computers stooped working in quite an
unusual state.
When I dial from one comp. to another the serial link is
established OK, the ppp device appears in /proc/net/dev, but ifconfig does
not show it and it can not be accessed or included in the routing table.
pppd leaves a message 'ioctl(SIOCADDRT) device route: Network is down' in
the syslog and that's all. The result is the same on both machines I want
to connect. One is still with kernel 2.0.30, other is with 2.2.11, the
pppd is version 2.2.0, I do use slackware on both of them.
So, if the kernel opens the device why ifconfig does not recognize
it and why it may not function?
Thanks, George.
/var/log/messages:
Sep 12 01:47:17 gate pppd[651]: pppd 2.2.0 started by solex, uid 517
Sep 12 01:47:17 gate pppd[651]: Using interface ppp0
Sep 12 01:47:17 gate pppd[651]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS3
Sep 12 01:47:21 gate pppd[651]: local IP address 10.0.0.1
Sep 12 01:47:21 gate pppd[651]: remote IP address 10.1.1.31
Sep 12 01:47:21 gate pppd[651]: IPCP terminated at peer's request
/proc/net/dev:
Inter-| Receive | Transmit
face |packets errs drop fifo frame|packets errs drop fifo colls carrier
lo: 102 0 0 0 0 102 0 0 0 0 0
ppp0: 11 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 22:59:27 -0500
From: Tom Treder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Eicon Diva ISDN T/A, RH6.0, ppp0 never comes up
What am I missing???
>From either a home-made script (included below) or linuxconf-generated
ppp config, I get the same result: The T/A dials up and appears to
connect, then disconnects after a couple of seconds. No ppp0 interface
ever comes up. The ISP has verified that pap authentication is
successful.
The only output from pppd or from chat is the following (tail
/var/log/messages):
Sep 11 22:35:15 yakko kernel: registered device ppp0
Sep 11 22:35:15 yakko pppd[767]: pppd 2.3.7 started by root, uid 0
Sep 11 22:35:18 yakko pppd[767]: Serial connection established.
Sep 11 22:35:18 yakko pppd[767]: Using interface ppp0
Sep 11 22:35:18 yakko pppd[767]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS0
Sep 11 22:35:20 yakko pppd[767]: Hangup (SIGHUP)
Sep 11 22:35:20 yakko pppd[767]: Modem hangup
Sep 11 22:35:20 yakko pppd[767]: Connection terminated.
Sep 11 22:35:20 yakko pppd[767]: Connect time 0.1 minutes.
Sep 11 22:35:21 yakko pppd[767]: Exit.
Here's my homebrew dialup script:
pppd /dev/ttyS0 115200 connect "chat -r /var/log/isdn.msg -f
/root/bin/isdnd.chat"
and here is the chat script "isdnd.chat"
"" ATZ
OK ATDT9537600
#CONNECT \r
115200 \r
and for thoroughness sake, here is the file /etc/ppp/options
No output has ever appeared in /var/log/isdn.msg, although the file did
get generated the first time I used the -r option.
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Bogus ppp device after kernel upgrade?
Date: 11 Sep 1999 23:02:04 -0500
G. Georgiev ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I did move to kernel 2.2.11 from 2.0.30 and the ppp connection I
> have on this PC to another one of my computers stooped working in quite an
> unusual state.
Read the Documentation/Changes file in the new kernel source tree. You
need to do this when you change kernels, particularly to a kernel in a
new series.
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* 97.3% of all statistics are made up. */
------------------------------
From: Tilman Kranz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Losing interest
Date: 12 Sep 1999 03:17:50 GMT
Michael Haag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been struggling to get my sound card functioning,
works fine here
> my printer to print plain text files properly,
works fine here
> and SAMBA to connect me to my NT shares.
works fine here
> I fully expected a learning curve, but this is becoming ridiculous.
go back to windows, if you please. Btw, this is a ->networking<-
NewsGroup.
> As faulty as the HELP system in Windows may be, it is
> light years ahead of Linux.
Its not portable, hughe, inefficent and only explains windows.
You haven�t read one FAQ, you flied over the HOWTOs and tried to solve
three or more problems at once - in that confused and hectic point�n�click
style. It is all on you. Have a look at the LDP and get a good book.
> I wish Linux good luck, just as I do AMD, but I'm doubtful it will ever
> become more widely used than it is currently.
If you associate "more widely used" with the possibility of impatient
improperly trained guys like you to get SAMBA working - I doubt it, too.
Bye,
Tilman.
------------------------------
From: KevinDTimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: cable modem can't ping gate way
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 02:12:57 GMT
netstat -nr prints your routing table
KT
HillBoy wrote:
>
> I'm in the same boat. How do you look at the routing table.
>
> KevinDTimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Well, I tried it and (by god) the little devil works like a charm!
> > Thanks from the bottom of my heart, I have been working on this since
> > 6:00 pm (plus a little playing yesterday) and all of the hollering
> > could have been over hours ago!
> >
> > Hallelujah!
> >
> > KT
> >
> > KevinDTimm wrote:
> > >
> > > Andrew,
> > >
> > > Well, its a little on the late side tonight (I'm dying to get to bed,
> > > but I think you probably hit it on the head) The routing is a good
> > > guess, actually my route table looks almost exactly like this.
> > >
> > > I will try it now (because I can't bear to wait)
> > >
> > > Thanks much, I'll report back.
> > >
> > > KT
> > >
> > > "Andrew J. Norman" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > First off check your routing table. You should have your default
> route
> > > > (0.0.0.0) look something like the one below
> > > >
> > > > Kernel IP routing table
> > > > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref
> Use
> > > > Iface
> > > > 24.2.97.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0
> 26
> > > > eth0
> > > > 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0
> 4
> > > > eth1
> > > > 192.168.2.0 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0
> 0
> > > > eth1
> > > > 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0
> 6 lo
> > > > 0.0.0.0 24.2.97.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0
> 244
> > > > eth0
> > > >
> > > > Note: the 192.168.1.0 and 192.168.2.0 are internal private networks
> and I
> > > > provide them just in case you also are routing internal traffic.
> > > >
> > > > Once you have verified your routing table, reset your cable modem
> (there
> > > > should be a switch on the back which when pressed for 10+ seconds will
> > > > reset the modem completely) This is primarily so that the modem will
> read
> > > > your MAC address and report it correctly (thus allowing the gateway to
>
> > > > properly route back TO you)
> > > >
> > > > At this point you should be able to route through the specified
> gateway
> > > > and have it recognize you.
> > > >
> > > > Andrew J. Norman
> > > > ______________________________________________________________
> > > > Dept. of Physics Phone:
> > > > College of William & Mary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > > "It is only with the heart that one can see rightly;
> > > > what is essential is invisible to the eye" -The Little Prince
> > > > ______________________________________________________________
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 6 Sep 1999, KevinDTimm wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I know this looks like a previous post, but it is subtlely
> different.
> > > > > I am attempting to connect to @home also, but cannot ping the
> default
> > > > > gateway (24.7.97.1). I am however able to ping another machine on
> the
> > > > > same network, 24.7.97.34 (this is my real @home address). I have
> tried
> > > > > switching the addresses of the machines (thinking that maybe my
> cable
> > > > > modem and the @home switching center have some knowledge of my
> address
> > > > > but that doesn't seem to have any affect.
> > > > >
> > > > > Here is my ifconfig output:
> > > > >
> > > > > lo Link encap:Local Loopback
> > > > > inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
> > > > > UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3584 Metric:1
> > > > > RX packets:88 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> > > > > TX packets:88 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> > > > >
> > > > > eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:04:12:8E:6D
> > > > > inet addr:24.7.97.33 Bcast:24.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
> > > > > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> > > > > RX packets:37 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> > > > > TX packets:23 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> > > > > Interrupt:10 Base address:0xe880
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks in advance,
> > > > >
> > > > > Kevin
> > > > >
> > > > > p.s. remove the XYZ to email back, BTW I will read the posts here
> and
> > > > > do not expect to get email.
> > > > >
> > > > >
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeremy Crabtree)
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Browsers and Linux
Date: 12 Sep 1999 04:47:44 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Richard Steiner allegedly wrote:
[SNIP]
> Either that or he's being intentionally difficult.
I pick the second one, I would suggest just throwing him into your killfile
and forgetting him.
--
"Being myself a remarkably stupid fellow, I have had to unteach myself
the difficulties, and now beg to present to my fellow fools the parts
that are not hard" --Silvanus P. Thompson, from "Calculus Made Easy."
------------------------------
From: PseudoTensor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: mount: RPC: Program not registered?
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 23:58:48 -0500
"William B. Cattell" wrote:
>
> On Thu, 09 Sep 1999, Douglas Nichols wrote:
> >Would someonne tell me whaqt this means?
> >
> >
> >Thanks
> >--
> >Cheers, dn
> >
> >Douglas Nichols [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >---------------------------------------------------------------
> >National Wilms Tumor Study Group 206.667.4283
> >Seattle, WA
>
> Doug - Take a look at the NFS HOWTO. It goes over this message in there.
>
> Bill
I wonder if you could help?
I get the same message,"mount: RPC: Program not registered.
I have one computer that has the /etc/rc.d/init.d/portmap ./netfs ./nfs
services going on RH6.0, and I can mount a local point like:
mount server:exportpoint mountpoint
on the server and it works fine. But not for a client. The client has
all the same services going.
I have in my /etc/exports on the server:
exportpoint client(rw)
yet I still get the not registered message. I've followed and re-read
the NFS-HOWTO a billion times now without any luck...Any help would be
greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Jon
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
