Hi, Haines:

 That ppp0 IP address in your route looks odd.
1.160.252.64.sn 
            ^^^   ?
 Perhaps it is a truncated FQDN.  More...

Haines Brown wrote:
> 
> Chuck,
> 
> I've revisited my drive with RH 8.0, and while the situation is
> different, not sure I've made much progress. After messing around last
> time, after booting eth0 was not seen. And so I had to deal with that
> first. Here's the result, which should be ok.
> 
>   # ifconfig -a
> 
>   eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:03:47:CA:FA:E2
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:6 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
>           RX bytes:400 (400.0 b)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
>           Interrupt:11 Base address:0xb000
> 
>   lo        Link encap:Local Loopback
>           inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
>           UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
>           RX packets:482 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:482 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>           RX bytes:33284 (32.5 Kb)  TX bytes:33284 (32.5 Kb)
> 
> I had been running rp-pppoe 3.4-7, but now upgraded it to 3.5-1. When I
> run adsl-setup to create a new configuration, I discovered that this
> time a /etc/ppp/pppoe.conf file is created. Clearly the distribution
> copy of roarding penguin was broken. When I run adsl-start, I now get
> a proper response and no hang:
> 
>     # adsl-start
>   . Connected!
> 
> Now my interfaces are looking good:
> 
>   # ifconfig -a
>   eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:03:47:CA:FA:E2
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:31 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:36 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
>           RX bytes:2490 (2.4 Kb)  TX bytes:2260 (2.2 Kb)
>           Interrupt:11 Base address:0xb000
> 
>   lo        Link encap:Local Loopback
>           inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
>           UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
>           RX packets:482 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:482 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>           RX bytes:33284 (32.5 Kb)  TX bytes:33284 (32.5 Kb)
> 
>   ppp0      Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol
>           inet addr:64.252.168.146  P-t-P:64.252.160.1  Mask:255.255.255.255
>           UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST  MTU:1492  Metric:1
>           RX packets:10 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:20 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:3
>           RX bytes:864 (864.0 b)  TX bytes:1298 (1.2 Kb)
> 
> However, I find that my routing table still missing eth0
> 
>   # netstat -nr
>   Kernel IP routing table
>   Destination  Gateway      Genmask         Flags MSS Window  irtt Iface
>   64.252.160.1 0.0.0.0      255.255.255.255 UH     40 0       0 ppp0
>   127.0.0.0    0.0.0.0      255.0.0.0       U      40 0       0 lo
>   0.0.0.0      64.252.160.1 0.0.0.0         UG     40 0       0 ppp0
> 
> I check with route:
> 
>   # route
>   Kernel IP routing table
>   Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags ...   Use Iface
>   1.160.252.64.sn *               255.255.255.255 UH    ...   0 ppp0
>   127.0.0.0       *               255.0.0.0       U     ...   0 lo
>   default         1.160.252.64.sn 0.0.0.0         UG    ...   0 ppp0
                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

 This may be a truncated fully qualified domain name (FQDN)
 and may not be ping-able.  Check with
# route -n
 instead.  I wonder what your (route -n) was before and after
adsl-start.

 Actually, I think that 'netstat -nr' is identical to 'route -n'.

> So I try to add it:
> 
>   # route add eth0
>   SIOCADDRT: No such device
> 
> I try to ping my gateway as reported by netstat above:
> 
>   # ping 64.252.160.1

 This is an external IP address.  This is great! :-)

> That is successful, but trying to ping the ppp0 address failed:
> 
>   # ping 1.160.252.64

 This is not the ppp0 address, 64.252.168.146 was.

> And other pings failed.

 ;-) What other pings?  Your other mention of an unpingable
 address was unpingable by others too.  :-|

 I can ping 'aol.com' and 'yahoo.com'.  Can you?
 This will test your DNS server.

 As per your report, everything looks fine...
 except your choice of IP addresses to ping.

HTH, Chuck

> Haines
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs

Reply via email to