-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Oh yeah... That's one of the wonderful things that I *LOVE* in Linux.  I
can chose 30,000 ways to do one type of task.

Minus writing reports, anyway.  I don't (yet) know any of the
text-formatting languages, so I'm using Word for Windows for the moment.
If I need to get to a page that is graphically intensive, and I need to
see the graphics, I use Communicator.  If I'm creating graphics for my
website, I use Communicator.

I can't think of anything else (at the moment) that I do in X.  I do AMAP
in the CL interface ;).

        - Mike

=====================================================================
Michael B. Trausch                                 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
V: (419) 838-8104                                   F: (815) 846-9374

   "Curiosity is the very basis of education and if you tell me that
   curiosity killed the cat, I say only the cat died nobly."
                                                - Arnold Edinborough

If you do not have my public PGP key, you are encouraged to obtain it
from my website at http://www.wcnet.org/~mtrausch/mt_pgp_key.gz.  You
            need to have PGP 5.0i or newer to use the key.
=====================================================================

On Fri, 19 Feb 1999, David Johnson wrote:

> On Fri, 19 Feb 1999, Akintayo Holder wrote:
> >Michael Trausch wrote:
> >> 
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >> 
> >> Yeah, I'm now to the point of looking at it with a different point of
> >> view, too.  It's kind of dangerous, in a way, because I've actually been
> >> using Linux for so long now, that I go back to DOS/Windows, and I type
> >> UNIX commands... lol... and of course, they don't work. ;)
> >> 
> >> Anyway... I'm very happy with Linux.  I'm not a game player, so that's an
> >> advantage.  I do Internet things the most, and I love the text mode
> >> interface (reminds me of the good 'ol days of the 8088, when you had to
> >> type everything into the archaic DOS 2.11 shell, and you ran off of a
> >> 5.25" floppy, although I run from a 3.5gb hard disk now.
> >
> >Ahh the old days, before the descent of the cursed WIMP
> >Linux brings back the command line but with multitasking and stability.
> >Call me weird but my favourite Linux features are quite simple; command
> >line completion, virtual consoles, file permissions and and REAL command
> >line. Any mistakes made are my fault not the pointing device. Simple,
> >clean, powerful, so many of them do not know what they are missing. The
> >command line is not to be feared but rather to be embraced, when was the
> >last time a text display gave serious problems.
> >
> >> And if you ask why I use it now, the answer you'll hear from me is this:
> >> Stability.  Reliability.  Comfortability..
> >> 
> >>         - Mike
> >> 
> >
> 
> Interesting points. Personally, I use a combination of CL and WIMP. I
> think we have three basic computer-usage philosophies out there:
> 
> 1) Command line only. Even if you have to use X for netscape or
> something, you always have an xterm on the screen). The adherents of
> this philosophy can be amongst the most fanatical. They use "ex". They
> use lynx.
> 
> 2) Point-and-click and Drag-and-drop only. This is the Mac world, and
> mostly the Windows world too. (As a friend pointed out upon seeing my
> KDE screen, "Egad, hasn't anyone discovered a better metaphor than a
> trashcan yet?") They use WordPerfect. They use Netscape Communicator.
> 
> 3) A combination of the two. There are many levels under this, from
> using the CL to get to WIMP (ala DOS), to using WIMP to get to the CL
> (ala ten xterms tiled up on the screen). They think LyX is cool. They
> use Netscape Navigator, but not necessarily Netscape Mail or News.
> 
> Neither of these philosophies is wrong. What is wrong is the insistance
> that Linux be just one of them. For the first time, we have an OS that
> can do either one of the three just as well as the others, with just as
> much power.
> 
> I can use Linux the way **I** want to, regardless of what Bill Gates or
> Richard Stallman think.
> 
> ---
> David Johnson
> 
> 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i for non-commercial use
Charset: noconv

iQA/AwUBNs5sLRLC9wZKsFmxEQJcJQCfcfrasgh+FIg7XawtCsXU45ZGJgIAoLoJ
ph80kgUV6fLQye2ga7IbLQTP
=lPPu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to