According to Josh Steiner: While burning my CPU.
> 
> Now I'm not exactly a newbie, but this seemed the best forum for this 
> question.  I've used linux for a number of years, but have never really 
> had to do much in the way of sys-admin duties (I would either just 
> reinstall or call over a friend if i needed a fix or new feature :)  Now 
> I am wrestling with trying to upgrade my gtk+ libraries.  What I am 
> realising is that my knowledge about how programs find libraries has all 
> just been picked up as I've gone.  I'd like to read a more coherent 
> description of this process.
> 
> The specific problem I'm running into is that I've installed the latest 
> stable GTK library, but am getting errors.  Could someone try to   
> describe the relationship of LD_LIBRARY_PATH, ldconfig, ld.so etc.  or 
> point me to some good documentation?  

Read; 'man ld' or for a full days reading; 'info -f ld'

However what you are doing is trying to compile a file without any options
at all, simply use the cammand 'make' that will make the whole lot in one go
and will use the variables which are defined in the Makefile.
All you need to is check that the LD variable is correct in the Makefile and
reflects to you situation.

> 
> here's the problem I'm having right now:
> 
> [root@bw66 trygtk]# gcc try.c 
> In file included from /usr/local/include/gdk/gdktypes.h:25,
>                  from /usr/local/include/gdk/gdk.h:23,
>                  from /usr/local/include/gtk/gtk.h:23,
>                  from try.c:1:
> /usr/local/include/glib.h:22: glibconfig.h: No such file or directory
> 
> [root@bw66 trygtk]# gcc -I /usr/local/lib/glib/include bb.c 
> /tmp/cca005171.o: In function `main':
> /tmp/cca005171.o(.text+0xf): undefined reference to `gtk_init'
> /tmp/cca005171.o(.text+0x19): undefined reference to `gtk_window_new'
> /tmp/cca005171.o(.text+0x2a): undefined reference to `gtk_widget_show'
> /tmp/cca005171.o(.text+0x32): undefined reference to `gtk_main'
> 
> Thanks alot!  
> 
> - Josh
> 
> ---
> Joshua W. H. Steiner - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://eds.org/~joschi
> 
> "Some scientists claim that hydrogen, because it is so plentyful, is the
> basic building block of the universe. I dispute that. I say there is more
> stupidity than hydrogen, and that is the basic building block of the
> universe." 
>    - Frank Zappa
> 
> 


-- 
Regards Richard.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to