Einar Sundgren wrote the following:
>
> I�d like to here some opinions on window managers, I personally like
> afterstep because of it�s nice look and many abilities to configure and
> i really like fvwm because it�s so small and fast. I have also tried
> enlightenment and the KDE window manager (whatever it is called) but
> they are a bit to large and slow for my taste and kde is also too
> unstable. Any comments ?
Personally I like twm (god knows why. I used to loath it) but am considering
switching to vtwm or ctwm for virtual screen support. twm is the fastest
thing I've tried (admitantly I've only tried E, KDE, fvwm and afterstep).
I don't like the other window managers cos their config files are IMO
rediculously large one way or the other. My .twmrc is dead-simple
and only 4k in size.
My previous favourite was fvwm. But I consider it too slow now. (I have a
PII-350+128meg of RAM)
--
CaT ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) URL: http://www.zip.com.au/dev/null
For a bad joke read:
http://www2.hunterlink.net.au/~ddhrg/censorship_legislation.html