I have notice that kde is quite a bit slower than Windowmaker and it has
seem to have inherited some of Windows unstable nature. I believe I was
using an older version of kde (just before 1.0) though.
*********************************************************
Jimmy Thomson
Computer Science Undergrad
Michigan Technological University
"Never try to be philosophical about sex when
you are in the mood"
*********************************************************
On Tue, 4 May 1999, Jonathan Sprague wrote:
> KDE large and slow and unstable? I don't have any problem with it, I'm
> using 1.0. I suppose if you use a 486 it is a bit slow but I have used it
> on 486 sx50 and it is acceptable (my main machine is AMD II 300). I just
> put it on a 486 dx33 and its OK, just have a lot of ram available (this one
> is 40meg). I like afterstep except on a small (14'') screen the warf is too
> big. Don't forget good old "openlook" and mwm!
>
> Einar Sundgren wrote:
>
> > I�d like to here some opinions on window managers, I personally like
> > afterstep because of it�s nice look and many abilities to configure and
> > i really like fvwm because it�s so small and fast. I have also tried
> > enlightenment and the KDE window manager (whatever it is called) but
> > they are a bit to large and slow for my taste and kde is also too
> > unstable. Any comments ?
> >
> > /Einar
>
