On Thu, 24 Jun 1999, Tom Taylor wrote:
> To me, "sda4" doesn't seem right. Have you tried "sda1" or just "sda"?
> I've never worked with any parallel port devices other than a printer so am
> not sure about this. Hopefully someone else can provide a better answer.
> I'd like to hear an answer to - if sda4 is correct, what are sda1..3? Is
> this something peculiar to parallel port devices?
This is because of the Macintosh partitionning scheme. If you look at a
Mac hard disk, the data partition (the one you want) is number 4. By doing
it this way, the same zip disks can be used on Mac and PC, as if they were
hard disks.
Frank
>
> Richard, Lawson, how about it?
>
> Tom
> --
> Tom Taylor Sr. Development Technician
> Telemedic Systems, Inc. 253.529.0526
> Member: PSLUG http://sealinux.itsite.com
> email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
HI! I'm a .signature virus! cp me into your .signature file to help me spread!
