El 24-Jun-99 [EMAIL PROTECTED] dijo:
> According to Tom Taylor: While burning my CPU.
>>
>> At 11:06 AM 6/24/99 -0300, you wrote:
>> >I've just compiled (twice...) a kernel version 2.2.9 both with SCSI
>> >support and SCSI-support and SCSI disk support (once within the kernel
>> >as it's said under Documentation/README.ppa and one as all modules).
>> >With none of them I could mount my Iomega parallel port.
>> > [...]
>
> Well i am not a SCSI man, however you could possably be on the correct
> track, considering the error msg above; =
>
> sda:scsidisk I/O error: dev 08:00, sector 0
> unable to read partition table
> mount: /dev/sda4 is not a valid block devic8e
>
> The error says "sda" and that sda4 is NOT a valid device, there is no
> mention of anything not being found, ie parport.o module, unresolved symbols
> or the such likes, it would even seem that vfat has been loaded or is
> included in the kernel.
>
> I would imagen that device 08:00 is in laymans terms, the first device of the
> 8th drive, which could mean its realy /dev/sda not sdax.
I don't know if i understand what u mean. But trying to mount /dev/sda on
/mnt/omega gives the following result:
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sda,
or too many mounted file systems
BUT I AM SURE that it's a DOS formatted Iomega disk !!! And there are just
mounted /dev/hda1 and /dev/cdrom. I guess these are not "many mounted file
systems"... Don't know what does it mean "bad superblock" or "bad option"...
> [...]
>
> --
> Regards Richard.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Jose Albores <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Tu "fortune":
Your wig steers the gig.
-- Lord Buckley
