My apologies. My real question was how the Slackware "distribution" is
different from RedHat. Especially from a user's point of view.
What does Slackware do that RedHat doesnot/cannot? And vice versa? Which
distribution is better than the other under what circumstances?
Most of the Linux books available in Thailand (Thai and English languages)
are RH specific.
TIA,
Shaggy
Bangkok, Thailand
At 22:03 22/7/99 +0700, Shaggy Im-erbtham wrote:
>It is not my intention to start a war, but I'd like to have different
>opinions how a Slackware installtion is different from a RedHat one.
>
>I read elsewhere that Slackware is good for the server while RH is good on
>the desktop.
>
>I am a slackman myself but I see a lot more RH around me: CD's, websites,
>web boards, etc.
>
>Shaggy
>
