On Fri, 23 Jul 1999, Shaggy Im-erbtham wrote:
> My apologies. My real question was how the Slackware "distribution" is
> different from RedHat. Especially from a user's point of view.
> What does Slackware do that RedHat doesnot/cannot? And vice versa? Which
> distribution is better than the other under what circumstances?
AFAIK, from the user's poitnt of view they are nearly identical. System
administration can be different, but in the end they will do the same.
Frank
> Most of the Linux books available in Thailand (Thai and English languages)
> are RH specific.
>
> TIA,
> Shaggy
> Bangkok, Thailand
>
>
> At 22:03 22/7/99 +0700, Shaggy Im-erbtham wrote:
> >It is not my intention to start a war, but I'd like to have different
> >opinions how a Slackware installtion is different from a RedHat one.
> >
> >I read elsewhere that Slackware is good for the server while RH is good on
> >the desktop.
> >
> >I am a slackman myself but I see a lot more RH around me: CD's, websites,
> >web boards, etc.
> >
> >Shaggy
> >
>
>
>
HI! I'm a .signature virus! cp me into your .signature file to help me spread!
