Richard,
Bad typo. You should have said '2.1.xx and 2.3.xx' instead of
'2.0.xx and 2.3.xx'.
Regards,
Kenneth
On Tue, 17 Aug 1999, Richard Adams wrote:
> >
> > Whoa, wait a second. Why are you comparing 2.2.x with 2.3.x ? !!!
> > Are not they quite different?
> >
> > Wondering, Chuck
>
> Yes very different, 2.2.x are considered stable/prodution kernels, like
> 2.0.xx and 2.3.xx are development kernels, so expect _bad_ things to happen.
> I have read in the linux-kernel-mailing-list that some new kernels have
> completely wiped out H/D's "BE WARNED".
>
> >
> >
> > Gerard Parat wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I looked at the linux-kernel flash infos and there is a warning about the
> > > file system corruption. They even discourage the use of 2.3.11 if you have
> > > precious data on your HD. It is a problem that doesn't appear on my machine
> > > until I have to shutdown/reboot it. So if you need to do that and you use a
> > > 2.2.9+ kernel, think about backup your data before (at least the
> > > modifications since last boot) ...
> > > There is also some quota related problems, and I used it for my users
> > > account. Other functionnality than AX25 were IP masquerade, FPAC, CLX, KDE
> > > 1.1 on my system.
> > > Hope this may give some clue if you experience Kernel panic at shutdown
> > > and/or filesystem corruption at boot time.
> > >
> > > 73 Gerard f6fgz
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards Richard.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
