On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 03:40:41AM -0600, Tom Tucker wrote: > > > > On 12/13/07 12:45 PM, "J. Bruce Fields" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Sorry for joining in a little late.... > > > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 05:31:54PM -0600, Tom Tucker wrote: > >> +int svc_reg_xprt_class(struct svc_xprt_class *xcl) > > > > None of the callers appear to check the return value, so this should > > probably be a void return. > > > > I don't feel strongly about this, but what I was trying to catch was two > different transports accidentally colliding on the same name. I doubt there > will be a run on new transports, but it would at least fail the module load > with a reasonable error.
Sounds fine. Thanks!--b. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
