On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 01:30:38PM -0600, Tom Tucker wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 09:04 -0600, Tom Tucker wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 09:54 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 06:26:24PM -0600, Tom Tucker wrote: > > > > I've coded all of the changes that you suggested and built a new > > > > patchset. Besides the tests I outlined in my "test matrix" are there any > > > > other tests you would like to see performed? > > > > > > krb5p testing might still be interesting. > > > > > > > I'll add it to my matrix. It will take some time to set up though since > > I don't have a KDC or anything set up. Are we under any time > > constraints? > > > > > > > > > > I could not reproduce the BUG_ON from Bull. I'm wondering if it's a PPC > > > > issue :-\ > > > > > > Hm, too bad, I'd like to understand that one. > > > > > FYI, I have now reproduced this bug on an AMD64 box with the > CITI_NFS4_ALL-1 tree. > > I am regression testing it on the new build have been running it about > 2hrs without failure.
OK, so probably either something got fixed in the server-xprt-switch patches since then, or something got fixed in mainline, or the problem was in one of the other CITI_NFS4_ALL patches. Hm. --b. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
