On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 01:27:41PM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
> Boris: you coded up a "static bool memory_error(struct mce *m)"
> function inside the patches for the corrected error thingy.
>
> Perhaps when it goes upstream it should be available for other
> users too?
I don't see why not. struct mce.cpuvendor even has the vendor in there
so memory_error() wouldn't even have to look at boot_cpu_data when doing
per-vendor decision.
I guess we should rename it to something more global namespace-y like
"mce_is_memory_error() or so, though, before we expose it to wider
audience...
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
