On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 7:54 PM, Ross Zwisler
<ross.zwis...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 05:09:21PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
>> Dynamic debug can be instructed to add the function name to the debug
>> output using the +f switch, so there is no need for the libnvdimm
>> modules to do it again. If a user decides to add the +f switch for
>> libnvdimm's dynamic debug this results in double prints of the function
>> name.
>>
>> Reported-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumsh...@suse.de>
>> Reported-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwis...@linux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.willi...@intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/nvdimm/badrange.c       |    3 +-
>>  drivers/nvdimm/btt_devs.c       |   21 ++++++++--------
>>  drivers/nvdimm/bus.c            |   13 +++++-----
>>  drivers/nvdimm/claim.c          |    2 +-
>>  drivers/nvdimm/core.c           |    4 ++-
>>  drivers/nvdimm/dax_devs.c       |    5 ++--
>>  drivers/nvdimm/dimm_devs.c      |    7 ++---
>>  drivers/nvdimm/label.c          |   51 
>> ++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>>  drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c |   38 ++++++++++++-----------------
>>  drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c       |   25 +++++++++----------
>>  drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c           |    2 +-
>>  11 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 94 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/badrange.c b/drivers/nvdimm/badrange.c
>> index e068d72b4357..df17f1cd696d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/badrange.c
>> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/badrange.c
>> @@ -176,8 +176,7 @@ static void set_badblock(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t 
>> s, int num)
>>                       (u64) s * 512, (u64) num * 512);
>>       /* this isn't an error as the hardware will still throw an exception */
>>       if (badblocks_set(bb, s, num, 1))
>> -             dev_info_once(bb->dev, "%s: failed for sector %llx\n",
>> -                             __func__, (u64) s);
>> +             dev_info_once(bb->dev, "failed for sector %llx\n", (u64) s);
>
> I don't think you should remove this one.  dev_info_once() is just a printk(),
> and doesn't inherit the +f flag from the dynamic debugging code. The __func__
> here does add value.
>
> The rest of these look correct, though I think you missed one in each of
> nvdimm_map_release()

This one is now fixed.

> and validate_dimm().  (I made these changes as well, but
> you sent out your patch first. :)

The validate_dimm() one is printing the callee function one level up
in the call chain, so it's fine as is.
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm

Reply via email to