On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 4:30 PM Verma, Vishal L <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 2019-07-25 at 19:55 -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 2:58 PM Vishal Verma <[email protected] > > > wrote: > > > The completion helpers for daxctl assumed the region arguments for > > > specifying daxctl regions were the same as ndctl regions, i.e. > > > "regionX". This is not true - daxctl region arguments are a simple > > > numeric 'id'. > > > > Oh, that's an unfortunate difference, but too late to change now I > > think, good find. > > > > Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <[email protected]> > > Yep - though I think I like --region=0 better than --region=region0, > less redundancy. But agreed, probably too late to change.
We could teach it to allow both. Something for the backlog, but at least the kernel is using a common number allocator for pmem regions and hmem regions. _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list [email protected] https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
