> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Williams <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, 1 April 2020 7:49 PM
> To: Alastair D'Silva <[email protected]>
> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K . V <[email protected]>; Oliver O'Halloran
> <[email protected]>; Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> <[email protected]>; Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>; Michael
> Ellerman <[email protected]>; Frederic Barrat <[email protected]>;
> Andrew Donnellan <[email protected]>; Arnd Bergmann
> <[email protected]>; Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>;
> Vishal Verma <[email protected]>; Dave Jiang
> <[email protected]>; Ira Weiny <[email protected]>; Andrew Morton
> <[email protected]>; Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> <[email protected]>; David S. Miller <[email protected]>;
> Rob Herring <[email protected]>; Anton Blanchard <[email protected]>;
> Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>; Mahesh Salgaonkar
> <[email protected]>; Madhavan Srinivasan
> <[email protected]>; Cédric Le Goater <[email protected]>; Anju T
> Sudhakar <[email protected]>; Hari Bathini
> <[email protected]>; Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>; Greg
> Kurz <[email protected]>; Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]>; Masahiro
> Yamada <[email protected]>; Alexey Kardashevskiy
> <[email protected]>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <[email protected]>;
> linuxppc-dev <[email protected]>; linux-nvdimm <linux-
> [email protected]>; Linux MM <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/25] powerpc/powernv: Map & release OpenCAPI
> LPC memory
> 
> On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 10:23 PM Alastair D'Silva <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > This patch adds OPAL calls to powernv so that the OpenCAPI driver can
> > map & release LPC (Lowest Point of Coherency)  memory.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alastair D'Silva <[email protected]>
> > Reviewed-by: Andrew Donnellan <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  arch/powerpc/include/asm/pnv-ocxl.h   |  2 ++
> >  arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/ocxl.c | 43
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 45 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pnv-ocxl.h
> > b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pnv-ocxl.h
> > index 7de82647e761..560a19bb71b7 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pnv-ocxl.h
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pnv-ocxl.h
> > @@ -32,5 +32,7 @@ extern int
> pnv_ocxl_spa_remove_pe_from_cache(void
> > *platform_data, int pe_handle)
> >
> >  extern int pnv_ocxl_alloc_xive_irq(u32 *irq, u64 *trigger_addr);
> > extern void pnv_ocxl_free_xive_irq(u32 irq);
> > +u64 pnv_ocxl_platform_lpc_setup(struct pci_dev *pdev, u64 size); void
> > +pnv_ocxl_platform_lpc_release(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> >
> >  #endif /* _ASM_PNV_OCXL_H */
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/ocxl.c
> > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/ocxl.c
> > index 8c65aacda9c8..f13119a7c026 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/ocxl.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/ocxl.c
> > @@ -475,6 +475,49 @@ void pnv_ocxl_spa_release(void *platform_data)
> }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pnv_ocxl_spa_release);
> >
> > +u64 pnv_ocxl_platform_lpc_setup(struct pci_dev *pdev, u64 size) {
> > +       struct pci_controller *hose = pci_bus_to_host(pdev->bus);
> > +       struct pnv_phb *phb = hose->private_data;
> 
> Is calling the local variable 'hose' instead of 'host' on purpose?
> 

Yes, this follows the convention used in other functions in this file.

> > +       u32 bdfn = pci_dev_id(pdev);
> > +       __be64 base_addr_be64;
> > +       u64 base_addr;
> > +       int rc;
> > +
> > +       rc = opal_npu_mem_alloc(phb->opal_id, bdfn, size,
> &base_addr_be64);
> > +       if (rc) {
> > +               dev_warn(&pdev->dev,
> > +                        "OPAL could not allocate LPC memory, rc=%d\n", rc);
> > +               return 0;
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       base_addr = be64_to_cpu(base_addr_be64);
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG_SPARSE
> 
> With the proposed cleanup in patch2 the ifdef can be elided here.

Ok
> 
> > +       rc = check_hotplug_memory_addressable(base_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT,
> > +                                             size >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> > +       if (rc)
> > +               return 0;
> 
> Is this an error worth logging if someone is wondering why their device is not
> showing up?
> 

Yes, I'll add a message.

> 
> > +#endif
> > +
> > +       return base_addr;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pnv_ocxl_platform_lpc_setup);
> > +
> > +void pnv_ocxl_platform_lpc_release(struct pci_dev *pdev) {
> > +       struct pci_controller *hose = pci_bus_to_host(pdev->bus);
> > +       struct pnv_phb *phb = hose->private_data;
> > +       u32 bdfn = pci_dev_id(pdev);
> > +       int rc;
> > +
> > +       rc = opal_npu_mem_release(phb->opal_id, bdfn);
> > +       if (rc)
> > +               dev_warn(&pdev->dev,
> > +                        "OPAL reported rc=%d when releasing LPC
> > +memory\n", rc); }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pnv_ocxl_platform_lpc_release);
> > +
> >  int pnv_ocxl_spa_remove_pe_from_cache(void *platform_data, int
> > pe_handle)  {
> >         struct spa_data *data = (struct spa_data *) platform_data;
> > --
> > 2.24.1
> >
> 
> 
> --
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> https://www.avg.com

_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to