Hi Felipe
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Felipe Balbi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 10:45:41AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nick Loeve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-n800.c | 2 --
>> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-n800.c
>> b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-n800.c
>> index ae85c2c..f902482 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-n800.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-n800.c
>> @@ -372,7 +372,6 @@ static struct omap2_mcspi_device_config
>> cx3110x_mcspi_config = {
>> .single_channel = 1,
>> };
>>
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_TSC2005
>> static struct tsc2005_platform_data tsc2005_config = {
>> .reset_gpio = 94,
>> .dav_gpio = 106
>> @@ -382,7 +381,6 @@ static struct omap2_mcspi_device_config
>> tsc2005_mcspi_config = {
>> .turbo_mode = 0,
>> .single_channel = 1,
>> };
>> -#endif
>
> This one i think it should remain the way it is. I'm wondering if it'll
> generate warnings in any way.
I didn't notice any, but then i didn't test it much...
>
> Could you try something?
>
> Remove also the CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_TSC2301. And try building n800/n810,
> n800-only and n810-only. Also flash and boot test them, please.
>
> If you don't get any warnings and no errors. I'm ok with this patch when
> you remove also the TSC2301 ifdef.
Sure, i can try. I only have a n800 to test on though... but i will
try anyway. Pretty busy this week, but i will get to it.
Cheers
>
> --
> Best Regards,
>
> Felipe Balbi
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://blog.felipebalbi.com
>
--
Nick Loeve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
