On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 07:21:53AM -0700, ext Emanoil Kotsev wrote:
> Dear Felipe, I just want to tell, that while still developing kernels in the 
> 2.6.2X series a kernel 2.6.22 can not be labeled as old.

Actually, it can, as it was released quite a long time ago.

> Besides it comes along with few distros as default kernel.

Yes, and these distros have to heavily patch it.

> A lot of people like me need some kind of a stable version that we can relay 
> on for more than playing at home, which is the case with 2.4.X tree. 
> 
> Personally, experiments with 2.6.24 brought me into a big trouble and it took 
> many hours to migrate back to 2.6.20, so please keep in mind that if we say 
> something like this, there is a good reason to do so.

I'd strongly suggest trying 2.6.26.

Cheers,
Daniel

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to