* Tony Lindgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080820 00:36]:
> * Russell King - ARM Linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080819 20:03]:
> > On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 07:12:28PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > Some register offsets are different for 242x and 243x. This
> > > will allow compiling sleep code for both chips into the same
> > > kernel.
> > >
> > > Note that some PM patches are still missing. The PM patches will
> > > be added later on once the base files are in sync with linux-omap
> > > tree.
> >
> > Please use git diff -M, since it makes the changes across renames more
> > obvious.
>
> OK
>
> > > +ENTRY(omap242x_idle_loop_suspend)
> > > + stmfd sp!, {r0, lr} @ save registers on stack
> > > + mov r0, #0x0 @ clear for mrc call
> > > + mcr p15, 0, r0, c7, c0, 4 @ wait for interrupt
> > > + ldmfd sp!, {r0, pc} @ restore regs and return
> >
> > What's been lost because of the lack of git diff -M here is the real
> > change:
> >
> > -ENTRY(omap24xx_idle_loop_suspend)
> > +ENTRY(omap242x_idle_loop_suspend)
> > stmfd sp!, {r0, lr} @ save registers on stack
> > - mov r0, #0 @ clear for mcr setup
> > + mov r0, #0x0 @ clear for mrc call
> > mcr p15, 0, r0, c7, c0, 4 @ wait for interrupt
> > ldmfd sp!, {r0, pc} @ restore regs and return
> >
> > which makes the problem stand out. That change of the 'mov' line
> > along with the comment is completely bogus. In fact, the change to
> > the comment is clearly wrong. The same applies to sleep243x.S
>
> Will remove.
>
> > Realistically, the only real difference between the two files are
> > these lines:
> >
> > omap2_ocs_sdrc_power:
> > - .word OMAP242X_SDRC_REGADDR(SDRC_POWER)
> > + .word OMAP243X_SDRC_REGADDR(SDRC_POWER)
> > A_SDRC0:
> > .word A_SDRC0_V
> > omap2_ocs_sdrc_dlla_ctrl:
> > - .word OMAP242X_SDRC_REGADDR(SDRC_DLLA_CTRL)
> > + .word OMAP243X_SDRC_REGADDR(SDRC_DLLA_CTRL)
> >
> > so is doubling the size of this code really justified?
>
> Yes duplication is a problem. We had code that was dynamically
> rewriting the addresses but it was not very easy to follow and
> hard to debug. This code is only compiled in twice if both 242x
> and 243x are both selected though.
>
> > Looking harder at this code:
> >
> > ENTRY(omap242x_cpu_suspend)
> > stmfd sp!, {r0 - r12, lr} @ save registers on stack
> > ...
> > mov r5, #0x2000 @ set delay (DPLL relock + DLL
> > relock)
> > ...
> > nop
> > mcr p15, 0, r2, c7, c0, 4 @ wait for interrupt
> > nop
> > loop:
> > subs r5, r5, #0x1 @ awake, wait just a bit
> > bne loop
> >
> > ldmfd sp!, {r0 - r12, pc} @ restore regs and return
> >
> > it's clear that registers are preserved across the wait-for-interrupt
> > instruction, so I'm not sure why saving all the registers is really
> > necessary, but that's only a side point to my main point, which is...
> >
> > ... that you could pass the addresses of these registers into the
> > function, either directly:
> >
> > void omap24xx_cpu_suspend(u32 dll_ctrl, u32 cpu_revision,
> > void __iomem *sdrc_pwr,
> > void __iomem *sdrc_dlla_ctrl);
> >
> > or via a structure, and thereby avoid this duplication.
>
> The structure would have to be also in SRAM then. I guess in this case
> there are only two addresses, so passing them via into the function
> should be enough. It's unlikely that this code changes any further
> to need more addresses.
>
> Will repost.
Here's this one refreshed. Looks like there was also a bug for boards
with SDR instead of DDR.
Tony
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile
index e7cf1b4..800639e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile
@@ -14,7 +14,10 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2420) += sram242x.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2430) += sram243x.o
# Power Management
-obj-$(CONFIG_PM) += pm.o sleep.o
+ifeq ($(CONFIG_PM),y)
+obj-y += pm.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP24XX) += sleep24xx.o
+endif
# Clock framework
obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2) += clock24xx.o
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep.S b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep24xx.S
similarity index 85%
rename from arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep.S
rename to arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep24xx.S
index 87a706f..43336b9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep.S
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep24xx.S
@@ -5,6 +5,10 @@
* Texas Instruments, <www.ti.com>
* Richard Woodruff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*
+ * (C) Copyright 2006 Nokia Corporation
+ * Fixed idle loop sleep
+ * Igor Stoppa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+ *
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
* published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of
@@ -26,6 +30,8 @@
#include <mach/io.h>
#include <mach/pm.h>
+#include <mach/omap24xx.h>
+
#include "sdrc.h"
/* First address of reserved address space? apparently valid for OMAP2 & 3 */
@@ -52,15 +58,14 @@ ENTRY(omap24xx_idle_loop_suspend_sz)
.word . - omap24xx_idle_loop_suspend
/*
- * omap242x_cpu_suspend() - Forces OMAP into deep sleep state by completing
+ * omap24xx_cpu_suspend() - Forces OMAP into deep sleep state by completing
* SDRC shutdown then ARM shutdown. Upon wake MPU is back on so just restore
* SDRC.
*
* Input:
* R0 : DLL ctrl value pre-Sleep
- * R1 : Processor+Revision
- * 2420: 0x21 = 242xES1, 0x26 = 242xES2.2
- * 2430: 0x31 = 2430ES1, 0x32 = 2430ES2
+ * R1 : SDRC_DLLA_CTRL
+ * R2 : SDRC_POWER
*
* The if the DPLL is going to AutoIdle. It seems like the DPLL may be back on
* when we get called, but the DLL probably isn't. We will wait a bit more in
@@ -80,15 +85,14 @@ ENTRY(omap24xx_idle_loop_suspend_sz)
*/
ENTRY(omap24xx_cpu_suspend)
stmfd sp!, {r0 - r12, lr} @ save registers on stack
- mov r3, #0x0 @ clear for mrc call
+ mov r3, #0x0 @ clear for mcr call
mcr p15, 0, r3, c7, c10, 4 @ memory barrier, hope SDR/DDR finished
nop
nop
- ldr r3, A_SDRC_POWER @ addr of sdrc power
- ldr r4, [r3] @ value of sdrc power
+ ldr r4, [r2] @ read SDRC_POWER
orr r4, r4, #0x40 @ enable self refresh on idle req
mov r5, #0x2000 @ set delay (DPLL relock + DLL relock)
- str r4, [r3] @ make it so
+ str r4, [r2] @ make it so
mov r2, #0
nop
mcr p15, 0, r2, c7, c0, 4 @ wait for interrupt
@@ -97,14 +101,13 @@ loop:
subs r5, r5, #0x1 @ awake, wait just a bit
bne loop
- /* The DPLL has on before we take the DDR out of self refresh */
+ /* The DPLL has to be on before we take the DDR out of self refresh */
bic r4, r4, #0x40 @ now clear self refresh bit.
- str r4, [r3] @ put vlaue back.
+ str r4, [r2] @ write to SDRC_POWER
ldr r4, A_SDRC0 @ make a clock happen
- ldr r4, [r4]
+ ldr r4, [r4] @ read A_SDRC0
nop @ start auto refresh only after clk ok
movs r0, r0 @ see if DDR or SDR
- ldrne r1, A_SDRC_DLLA_CTRL_S @ get addr of DLL ctrl
strne r0, [r1] @ rewrite DLLA to force DLL reload
addne r1, r1, #0x8 @ move to DLLB
strne r0, [r1] @ rewrite DLLB to force DLL reload
@@ -116,13 +119,8 @@ loop2:
/* resume*/
ldmfd sp!, {r0 - r12, pc} @ restore regs and return
-A_SDRC_POWER:
- .word OMAP242X_SDRC_REGADDR(SDRC_POWER)
A_SDRC0:
.word A_SDRC0_V
-A_SDRC_DLLA_CTRL_S:
- .word OMAP242X_SDRC_REGADDR(SDRC_DLLA_CTRL)
ENTRY(omap24xx_cpu_suspend_sz)
.word . - omap24xx_cpu_suspend
-
diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/pm.h
b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/pm.h
index bfa0932..b0e11ea 100644
--- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/pm.h
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/pm.h
@@ -135,7 +135,8 @@ extern void omap_pm_suspend(void);
extern void omap730_cpu_suspend(unsigned short, unsigned short);
extern void omap1510_cpu_suspend(unsigned short, unsigned short);
extern void omap1610_cpu_suspend(unsigned short, unsigned short);
-extern void omap24xx_cpu_suspend(u32 dll_ctrl, u32 cpu_revision);
+extern void omap24xx_cpu_suspend(u32 dll_ctrl, void __iomem *sdrc_dlla_ctrl,
+ void __iomem *sdrc_power);
extern void omap730_idle_loop_suspend(void);
extern void omap1510_idle_loop_suspend(void);
extern void omap1610_idle_loop_suspend(void);
