On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 07:51 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> On Monday 01 September 2008, stanley.miao wrote:
> > +       if(!is_sil_rev_less_than(OMAP3430_REV_ES2_0)) {
> 
> But checkpatch.pl rejected that, yes?  Fixed in a later
> version I see.

It has been fixed in a later version.
> 
> ... and in "static int sdp2430_panel_enable(...)" this would
> seem to be wrong.  But for that matter, lcd_2430sdp.c should
> not be relevant for any 3430 board anyway...

this was shared between two boards.

> 
> If that file is, oddly, being shared between two boards ...
> then put that code in the "if (machine_is_omap_3430sdp())"
> block.  And someone should consider renaming the file if
> it's not specific to the 2430 SDP.

OMAP3430_ES1 doesn't have this problem.

Stanley.

> 
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to