On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:47:44AM -0700, David Brownell wrote: > On Tuesday 14 October 2008, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > I didn't quite get you here. The idea of mmc_fck is so that > > > > clk_get(dev, "mmc_fck"); > > > > works fine and returns the correct clock. If we have several fck and ick > > function names, how will we clk_get() the right one ?? > > If "dev" is an MMC device, there's no way to confuse > its "fck" and "ick" with those for, say, I2C. Right? > That's the whole point of associating logical clock > names with the device. > > And as Paul noted, if a device has several such clocks, > then it needs several such names.
hmm... that's true. Forgot about matching dev as well :-p hehehe. Makes sense to me, let's use fclk and iclk then :-) The main idea then would be that clk(dev, "iclk") translates to english into "get me the interface clock of mmc device" (when dev is an mmc device, of course). -- balbi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
