Op 10 nov 2008, om 12:30 heeft Rajendra Nayak het volgende geschreven:

+#elif defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3) && !defined(CONFIG_OMAP_PM_NONE)\
+       && defined(CONFIG_MACH_OMAP_3430SDP)

Could this be changed to machine_is_<foo>() so multi-omap kernels work? And if not, doesn't CONFIG_MACH_OMAP_3430SDP imply CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3?

regards,

Koen

Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to