Hi Tony, On Thursday 28 August 2014 04:58 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > We don't need twl4030_phy_power() any longer now that we have > the runtime PM calls. Let's get rid of it as it's confusing. > No functional changes, just move the code and use res instead > of ret as we are not returning that value.
Now that you are doing pm_runtime_get_sync in twl4030_phy_init, won't it power on the phy even before initializing it (since runtime_resume will be invoked even before doing phy_init)? Even if pm_runtime_get_sync in not done in twl4030_phy_init, phy-core itself does pm_runtime_get_sync in phy_init(). Thanks Kishon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
