* Suman Anna <[email protected]> [150320 16:24]: > On 03/20/2015 05:35 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Suman Anna <[email protected]> [150320 14:44]: > >> On 03/20/2015 01:44 PM, Kristo, Tero wrote: > >>> + scm: scm@210000 { > >>> + compatible = "ti,am3-scm", "simple-bus"; > >>> + reg = <0x210000 0x2000>; > >>> + #address-cells = <1>; > >>> + #size-cells = <1>; > >>> + ranges = <0 0x210000 0x2000>; > >>> + > >>> + am33xx_pinmux: pinmux@800 { > >>> + compatible = "pinctrl-single"; > >>> + reg = <0x800 0x238>; > >>> + #address-cells = <1>; > >>> + #size-cells = <0>; > >>> + pinctrl-single,register-width = <32>; > >>> + pinctrl-single,function-mask = <0x7f>; > >>> + }; > >>> + > >>> + scm_conf: scm_conf@0 { > >>> + compatible = "syscon"; > >>> + reg = <0x0 0x7fc>; > >> > >> Hmm, you are consolidating the am33xx_control_module and cm nodes, so is > >> this supposed to be 0x800 or 0x7fc? I would think it should be 0x800. > > > > Seems correct to me, it's offset 0, size 0x7fc. So that's the scm_conf > > syscon area before pinctrl-single at 0x44c00000 + 0x210000 + 0. > > > > The io area for pinctrl-single starts at 0x800, so the scm_conf should > > be before it in the dts file. > > Well, I understand that it is how it was before, but we won't be mapping > or covering the last register efuse_sma before the pinctrl cfg > registers. Any reason for just leaving out that register?
Oh I see yeah that looks like a bug to me. Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
