Thanks, Vaibhav Hiremath
> -----Original Message----- > From: Hans Verkuil [mailto:hverk...@xs4all.nl] > Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2009 9:24 PM > To: Hiremath, Vaibhav > Cc: linux-me...@vger.kernel.org; Aguirre Rodriguez, Sergio Alberto; > DongSoo(Nathaniel) Kim; Toivonen Tuukka.O (Nokia-D/Oulu); linux- > o...@vger.kernel.org; Nagalla, Hari; Sakari Ailus; Jadav, Brijesh R; > R, Sivaraj; Hadli, Manjunath; Shah, Hardik; Kumar, Purushotam > Subject: Re: [RFC] Stand-alone Resizer/Previewer Driver support > under V4L2 framework > > On Tuesday 31 March 2009 10:53:02 Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote: > > Thanks, > > Vaibhav Hiremath > > > > > > APPROACH 3 - > > > > ---------- > > > > > > > > ..... > > It makes sense, since such memory-to-memory devices will mostly > being > > used from codecs context. And this would be more clear from user > > application. > > To be honest, I don't see the need for this. I think > TYPE_VIDEO_CAPTURE and > TYPE_VIDEO_OUTPUT are perfectly fine. > [Hiremath, Vaibhav] Agreed, and you will also find implementation of driver aligned to this which I have shared with you. > > And as acknowledged by you, we can use VIDIOC_S_FMT for setting > > parameters. > > > > One thing I am not able to convince myself is that, using "priv" > field > > for custom configuration. > > I agree. Especially since you cannot use it as a pointer to addition > information. > > > I would prefer and recommend capability based > > interface, where application will query the capability of the > device for > > luma enhancement, filter coefficients (number of coeff and depth), > > interpolation type, etc... > > > > This way we can make sure that, any such future devices can be > adapted by > > this framework. > > The big question is how many of these capabilities are 'generic' and > how > many are very much hardware specific. I am leaning towards using the > extended control API for this. It's a bit awkward to implement in > drivers > at the moment, but that should improve in the future when a lot of > the > control handling code will move into the new core framework. > > I really need to know more about the sort of features that > omap/davinci > offer (and preferably also for similar devices by other > manufacturers). > [Hiremath, Vaibhav] Hans, Can we have IRC session for this? We will discuss this in detail and try to get closure on it. Again I would request you to join me and mauro on IRC chat, I will be staying online tomorrow. > > > > Regards, > > Hans > > -- > Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by TANDBERG -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
