> From: [email protected] [mailto:linux-omap-
> > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Gupta, Ajay Kumar
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 5:13 PM
> >
> [...]
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-musb.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-
> > musb.c
> > index a80441d..529e2b1 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-musb.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-musb.c
> > @@ -148,10 +148,14 @@ static struct platform_device musb_device = {
> >
> > void __init usb_musb_init(void)
> > {
> > - if (cpu_is_omap243x())
> > + if (cpu_is_omap243x()) {
> > musb_resources[0].start = OMAP243X_HS_BASE;
> > - else
> > + } else {
> Do you need {} for a one liner? Checkpatch should have warned you I think..
>
Er, CodingStyle says you need to do this, if the else clause
has brackets.
> > musb_resources[0].start = OMAP34XX_HSUSB_OTG_BASE;
> > + /* OMAP3EVM Rev >= E can source 500mA */
> > + if (get_omap3_evm_rev() >= OMAP3EVM_BOARD_GEN_2)
> > + musb_plat.power = 250;
> > + }
> > musb_resources[0].end = musb_resources[0].start + SZ_8K - 1;
> >
> > /*
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_regs.h b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_regs.h
> > index cc1d71b..a0314df 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_regs.h
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_regs.h
> > @@ -72,6 +72,10 @@
> > #define MUSB_DEVCTL_HR 0x02
> > #define MUSB_DEVCTL_SESSION 0x01
> >
> > +/* ULPI VBUSCONTROL */
> > +#define ULPI_USE_EXTVBUS 0x01
> > +#define ULPI_USE_EXTVBUSIND 0x02
> > +
> > /* TESTMODE */
> > #define MUSB_TEST_FORCE_HOST 0x80
> > #define MUSB_TEST_FIFO_ACCESS 0x40
> > @@ -246,6 +250,7 @@
> >
> > /* REVISIT: vctrl/vstatus: optional vendor utmi+phy register at 0x68 */
> > #define MUSB_HWVERS 0x6C /* 8 bit */
> > +#define MUSB_ULPI_BUSCONTROL 0x70 /* 8 bit */
> >
> > #define MUSB_EPINFO 0x78 /* 8 bit */
> > #define MUSB_RAMINFO 0x79 /* 8 bit */
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/omap2430.c b/drivers/usb/musb/omap2430.c
> > index 6761d20..c5fcc30 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/musb/omap2430.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/musb/omap2430.c
> > @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
> > #include <asm/mach-types.h>
> > #include <mach/hardware.h>
> > #include <plat/mux.h>
> > +#include <plat/board.h>
> >
> > #include "musb_core.h"
> > #include "omap2430.h"
> > @@ -203,6 +204,7 @@ int musb_platform_set_mode(struct musb *musb, u8
> > musb_mode)
> > int __init musb_platform_init(struct musb *musb)
> > {
> > u32 l;
> > + u8 val;
> >
> > #if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2430)
> > omap_cfg_reg(AE5_2430_USB0HS_STP);
> > @@ -239,6 +241,13 @@ int __init musb_platform_init(struct musb *musb)
> > l |= ULPI_12PIN;
> > omap_writel(l, OTG_INTERFSEL);
> >
> > + /* Program PHY to use external Vbus supply for OMAP3EVM Rev >= E */
> > + if (get_omap3_evm_rev() >= OMAP3EVM_BOARD_GEN_2) {
> > + val = musb_readb(musb->mregs, MUSB_ULPI_BUSCONTROL);
> > + val |= ULPI_USE_EXTVBUS;
> > + musb_writeb(musb->mregs, MUSB_ULPI_BUSCONTROL, val);
> > + }
> Do we want to do board specific logic inside a IP logic? Wont it be better to
> do it some way else?
Maybe add a flag to pass down from the board files? I think other
boards might also end up using this.
>
> Regards,
> Nishanth Menon
> --
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
