Hi, Is there any update on this chain seeing this has been pending for a month now?
-Tero >-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] >[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of ext >Woodruff, Richard >Sent: 22 October, 2009 15:20 >To: Cousson, Benoit; Paul Walmsley; Nayak, Rajendra >Cc: [email protected] >Subject: RE: [PATCH] OMAP3: DVFS: No sdrc AC timing changes >during core dvfs > >Hi Beonit, > >> From: Cousson, Benoit >> Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 3:59 AM >> To: Woodruff, Richard; Paul Walmsley; Nayak, Rajendra > >> >It is not guaranteed safe to write actim registers on the >fly to an active >> >part. It is safe to do RFR as it is buffered and sent out >at a safe time. >> >> I think that what Paul is suggesting is to change the ACTIM >after ensuring >> that the DDR is in self-refresh. In that case it is >perfectly valid; it is >> just tricky to ensure that all initiators are in mute before >doing that. > >Yes that is true, however, ... > >That is not the way the code is setup and it's a long way from >that. Run time pause of drivers is a minefield. > >With out a broad notifier they best you would hope for is some >opportunistic change time (against full system). You wouldn't >have a guaranteed way to speed them up again where you need >them most at high opp. > >Some minimal kernel not using dma and the like could do it but >that is probably more misleading to put in the tree than >something useful for most. > >Regards, >Richard W. > >-- >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe >linux-omap" in >the body of a message to [email protected] >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
