Menon, Nishanth wrote:
> We had removed the frequency for OPP1 L3 when we used to use frequency
> to enable/disable frequencies. It is better to populate the same
> instead of confusing future readers of the code. The OPP1 remains
> disabled as explained in the discussion.

IMHO the best way to unconfuse readers is to remove the entry.
> 
> Discussion: http://marc.info/?t=126453821900001&r=1&w=2
> 
> Cc: Andrew Murray <[email protected]>
> Cc: Benoit Cousson <[email protected]>
> Cc: Kevin Hilman <[email protected]>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpufreq34xx.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpufreq34xx.c 
> b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpufreq34xx.c
> index 209af2b..aec1ffe 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpufreq34xx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpufreq34xx.c
> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ static struct omap_opp_def __initdata 
> omap34xx_mpu_rate_table[] = {
>  
>  static struct omap_opp_def __initdata omap34xx_l3_rate_table[] = {
>       /* OPP1 */
> -     OMAP_OPP_DEF(false, 0, 975000),
> +     OMAP_OPP_DEF(false, 41500000, 975000),
>       /* OPP2 */
>       OMAP_OPP_DEF(true, 83000000, 1050000),
>       /* OPP3 */

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to