Lesly A M <lesl...@ti.com> writes:
> This patch will add a new function omap_voltage_vc_update() to re-program
> the VC parameters while entering low power mode, based on CORE_DOMAIN target
> state.
> The voltsetup2 is used only when the device exits sys_off mode
> (with PRM_VOLTCTRL[3]SEL_OFF set to 1).
>
> Also removed the clearing of PRM_VOLTCTRL register bits, because this will be
> used only when it goes to low power mode next time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lesly A M <x0080...@ti.com>
> Cc: Nishanth Menon <n...@ti.com>
> Cc: David Derrick <dderr...@ti.com>
> Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sa...@linux.intel.com>
Again, issues from previous review[1] re-appear again.
For the record, when a series is posted multiple times and issues
raised in previous reviews continue to appear, you should expect
maintainers to pay less and less attention to the series. I for one
have an attention span that grows very short when I repeatedly see the
same issues re-posted.
The comment below are ones I already raised in v5[1].
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c | 26 +++-----------------------
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/voltage.c | 41
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/voltage.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
> index 5039b35..1ff6293 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
> @@ -439,20 +439,12 @@ void omap_sram_idle(void)
> if (core_next_state < PWRDM_POWER_ON) {
> omap_uart_prepare_idle(0);
> omap_uart_prepare_idle(1);
> - if (core_next_state == PWRDM_POWER_OFF) {
> - u32 voltctrl = OMAP3430_AUTO_OFF;
> + /* Update the voltsetup time for RET/OFF */
> + omap_voltage_vc_update(core_next_state);
>
> - if (voltage_off_while_idle)
> - voltctrl |= OMAP3430_SEL_OFF;
> - prm_set_mod_reg_bits(voltctrl,
> - OMAP3430_GR_MOD,
> - OMAP3_PRM_VOLTCTRL_OFFSET);
> + if (core_next_state == PWRDM_POWER_OFF) {
> omap3_core_save_context();
> omap3_prcm_save_context();
> - } else if (core_next_state == PWRDM_POWER_RET) {
> - prm_set_mod_reg_bits(OMAP3430_AUTO_RET,
> - OMAP3430_GR_MOD,
> - OMAP3_PRM_VOLTCTRL_OFFSET);
> }
> }
OK, the in the idle path, you replace the various VC settings with a
call into the voltage layer. Good. But...
> @@ -510,18 +502,6 @@ void omap_sram_idle(void)
> }
> omap_uart_resume_idle(0);
> omap_uart_resume_idle(1);
> - if (core_next_state == PWRDM_POWER_OFF) {
> - u32 voltctrl = OMAP3430_AUTO_OFF;
> -
> - if (voltage_off_while_idle)
> - voltctrl |= OMAP3430_SEL_OFF;
> - prm_clear_mod_reg_bits(voltctrl,
> - OMAP3430_GR_MOD,
> - OMAP3_PRM_VOLTCTRL_OFFSET);
> - } else if (core_next_state == PWRDM_POWER_RET)
> - prm_clear_mod_reg_bits(OMAP3430_AUTO_RET,
> - OMAP3430_GR_MOD,
> - OMAP3_PRM_VOLTCTRL_OFFSET);
...in the resume path, this entire part is removed, but with
replacement call into the voltage layer. This needs to be well
documented in the changelog as to why this is not needed.
Even better, if this part is really unnecessary, which by your patch
you seem to imply, you should send a separate patch removing it with a
good description.
Kevin
[1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=127249508726287&w=2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
