* Govindraj <[email protected]> [100607 17:50]:
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Govindraj <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Tony Lindgren <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> * Kevin Hilman <[email protected]> [100604 18:30]:
> >>>
> >>> > + w &= ~0x7;
> >>> > + w |= OMAP_MUX_MODE2;
> >>> > + omap_ctrl_writew(w, uart->padconf);
> >>
> >> Generic NAK for tinkering with the mux registers directly.
> >>
> >> Instead, Govindraj, please add omap_mux_request_signal() into mux.c:
> >>
> >> void __iomem * __init omap_mux_request_signal(char *muxname);
>
> Looking into mach-omap2/mux.c
>
> Wouldn't retrieving offset will be enough as i have to depend on
> again *_mux_* function call for remux which can have the offset and val
> as parameter.
You call omap_mux_request_signal with the signal name, and get
the register address. Then you can just set it with readw/writew.
> So I need to use ""K15_24XX_UART3_TX" as name to retrieve
> UART3 offset if I am correct and traverse through the list doing an strcmp
> on name to retrieve offset.
>
> In that case I dont find uart1/2/4 in list,
> Should that be added into the list?
No, that's the old mux code. You want to do something like
void __iomem *uart1_rx;
uart1_rx = omap_mux_request_signal("uart1_rx");
if (!uart1_rx)
return -ENODEV;
...
See the signal names in mux34xx.c and the TRM. Then omap2 and omap4
will work automatically once the mux code is ready for those.
Regards,
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
