On OMAP SMP configuartion, both processors share the voltage
and clock. So both CPUs needs to be scaled together and hence
needs software co-ordination.

Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <[email protected]>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <[email protected]>
cc: Vishwanath BS <[email protected]>
---
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap2plus-cpufreq.c |   71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap2plus-cpufreq.c 
b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap2plus-cpufreq.c
index 48da867..8c903c1 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap2plus-cpufreq.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap2plus-cpufreq.c
@@ -26,9 +26,11 @@
 #include <linux/clk.h>
 #include <linux/io.h>
 #include <linux/opp.h>
+#include <linux/cpu.h>
 
 #include <asm/system.h>
 #include <asm/smp_plat.h>
+#include <asm/cpu.h>
 
 #include <plat/clock.h>
 #include <plat/omap-pm.h>
@@ -63,7 +65,7 @@ static unsigned int omap_getspeed(unsigned int cpu)
 {
        unsigned long rate;
 
-       if (cpu)
+       if (cpu >= NR_CPUS)
                return 0;
 
        rate = clk_get_rate(mpu_clk) / 1000;
@@ -74,9 +76,13 @@ static int omap_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
                       unsigned int target_freq,
                       unsigned int relation)
 {
-       int ret = 0;
+       int i, ret = 0;
        struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
 
+       /* Wait untill all CPU's are initialized */
+       if (is_smp() && (num_online_cpus() < NR_CPUS))
+               return ret;
+
        /* Ensure desired rate is within allowed range.  Some govenors
         * (ondemand) will just pass target_freq=0 to get the minimum. */
        if (target_freq < policy->min)
@@ -84,15 +90,25 @@ static int omap_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
        if (target_freq > policy->max)
                target_freq = policy->max;
 
-       freqs.old = omap_getspeed(0);
+       freqs.old = omap_getspeed(policy->cpu);
        freqs.new = clk_round_rate(mpu_clk, target_freq * 1000) / 1000;
-       freqs.cpu = 0;
+       freqs.cpu = policy->cpu;
 
        if (freqs.old == freqs.new)
                return ret;
 
-       cpufreq_notify_transition(&freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
+       if (!is_smp()) {
+               cpufreq_notify_transition(&freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
+               goto set_freq;
+       }
+
+       /* notifiers */
+       for_each_cpu(i, policy->cpus) {
+               freqs.cpu = i;
+               cpufreq_notify_transition(&freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
+       }
 
+set_freq:
 #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEBUG
        pr_info("cpufreq-omap: transition: %u --> %u\n", freqs.old, freqs.new);
 #endif
@@ -100,6 +116,7 @@ static int omap_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
        ret = clk_set_rate(mpu_clk, freqs.new * 1000);
        if (ret)
                return ret;
+       freqs.new = omap_getspeed(policy->cpu);
 
        /*
         * Generic CPUFREQ driver jiffy update is under !SMP. So jiffies
@@ -107,12 +124,32 @@ static int omap_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
         * CONFIG_SMP enabled. Below code is added only to manage that
         * scenario
         */
-       if (!is_smp())
+       if (!is_smp()) {
                loops_per_jiffy =
                         cpufreq_scale(loops_per_jiffy, freqs.old, freqs.new);
+               cpufreq_notify_transition(&freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
+               goto skip_lpj;
+       }
 
-       cpufreq_notify_transition(&freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+       /*
+        * Note that loops_per_jiffy is not updated on SMP systems in
+        * cpufreq driver. So, update the per-CPU loops_per_jiffy value
+        * on frequency transition. We need to update all dependent cpus
+        */
+       for_each_cpu(i, policy->cpus)
+               per_cpu(cpu_data, i).loops_per_jiffy =
+                       cpufreq_scale(per_cpu(cpu_data, i).loops_per_jiffy,
+                                       freqs.old, freqs.new);
+#endif
+
+       /* notifiers */
+       for_each_cpu(i, policy->cpus) {
+               freqs.cpu = i;
+               cpufreq_notify_transition(&freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
+       }
 
+skip_lpj:
        return ret;
 }
 
@@ -120,15 +157,16 @@ static int __init omap_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy 
*policy)
 {
        int result = 0;
        struct device *mpu_dev;
+       static cpumask_var_t cpumask;
 
        mpu_clk = clk_get(NULL, "cpu_ck");
        if (IS_ERR(mpu_clk))
                return PTR_ERR(mpu_clk);
 
-       if (policy->cpu != 0)
+       if (policy->cpu >= NR_CPUS)
                return -EINVAL;
 
-       policy->cur = policy->min = policy->max = omap_getspeed(0);
+       policy->cur = policy->min = policy->max = omap_getspeed(policy->cpu);
 
        mpu_dev = omap2_get_mpuss_device();
        if (!mpu_dev) {
@@ -150,7 +188,20 @@ static int __init omap_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy 
*policy)
 
        policy->min = policy->cpuinfo.min_freq;
        policy->max = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
-       policy->cur = omap_getspeed(0);
+       policy->cur = omap_getspeed(policy->cpu);
+
+       /*
+        * On OMAP SMP configuartion, both processors share the voltage
+        * and clock. So both CPUs needs to be scaled together and hence
+        * needs software co-ordination. Use cpufreq affected_cpus
+        * interface to handle this scenario. Additional is_smp() check
+        * is to keep SMP_ON_UP builf working.
+        */
+       if (is_smp()) {
+               policy->shared_type = CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_ANY;
+               cpumask_or(cpumask, cpumask_of(policy->cpu), cpumask);
+               cpumask_copy(policy->cpus, cpumask);
+       }
 
        /* FIXME: what's the actual transition time? */
        policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = 300 * 1000;
-- 
1.6.0.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to