Hi Tony,

Tony Lindgren <[email protected]> writes:

> This allows us to remove cpu_is_omap calls from init_irq functions
> and the irq handler. There should not be any need for cpu_is_omap
> as at this point we only care about SoC generation, and not about
> subcategories.
>
> The main reason for the patch is that we want to initialize only
> minimal omap specific code from the init_early call, and this and
> the following patches get us closer to that goal.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <[email protected]>

[...]

A couple of minor comments on naming below...

> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c
> index bc524b9..33a5c0d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c
> @@ -103,28 +103,36 @@ static void omap_ack_irq(struct irq_data *d)
>       intc_bank_write_reg(0x1, &irq_banks[0], INTC_CONTROL);
>  }
>  
> +static inline void _omap_mask_irq(int irq)
> +{
> +     int offset = irq & (~(IRQ_BITS_PER_REG - 1));
> +     irq &= (IRQ_BITS_PER_REG - 1);
> +     intc_bank_write_reg(1 << irq, &irq_banks[0], INTC_MIR_SET0 + offset);
> +}
> +
>  static void omap_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
>  {
>       unsigned int irq = d->irq;
> -     int offset = irq & (~(IRQ_BITS_PER_REG - 1));
>  
> -     if (cpu_is_omap34xx() && !cpu_is_ti816x()) {
> -             int spurious = 0;
> +     _omap_mask_irq(irq);
> +}
>  
> -             /*
> -              * INT_34XX_GPT12_IRQ is also the spurious irq. Maybe because
> -              * it is the highest irq number?
> -              */
> -             if (irq == INT_34XX_GPT12_IRQ)
> -                     spurious = omap_check_spurious(irq);
> +static void omap_mask_irq_omap3(struct irq_data *d)

how about omap3_mask_irq().

In most other code we're using the SoC name as a prefix instead of
suffix.

> +{
> +     unsigned int irq = d->irq;
> +     int spurious = 0;
>  
> -             if (!spurious)
> -                     previous_irq = irq;
> -     }
> +     /*
> +      * INT_34XX_GPT12_IRQ is also the spurious irq. Maybe because
> +      * it is the highest irq number?
> +      */
> +     if (irq == INT_34XX_GPT12_IRQ)
> +             spurious = omap_check_spurious(irq);
>  
> -     irq &= (IRQ_BITS_PER_REG - 1);
> +     if (!spurious)
> +             previous_irq = irq;
>  
> -     intc_bank_write_reg(1 << irq, &irq_banks[0], INTC_MIR_SET0 + offset);
> +     _omap_mask_irq(irq);
>  }
>  
>  static void omap_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> @@ -143,6 +151,12 @@ static void omap_mask_ack_irq(struct irq_data *d)
>       omap_ack_irq(d);
>  }
>  
> +static void omap_mask_ack_irq_omap3(struct irq_data *d)

Also here: omap3_mask_ack_irq()

Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to