Mike, Kevin,

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Mike Turquette <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Nishanth Menon <[email protected]>
>
> We have multiple interrupt status hidden in the PRM interrupt status
> reg. Make this handling generic to allow us to pull out LDO status such
> as those for ABB from it using the same data structure and indexing. We
> hence rename accordingly.
I am not sure that the rename is needed.

Kevin, Nishant, what is your opinion?

Regards,
Jean

>
> We also fix a trivial warning as the variable does not need exporting:
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm2xxx_3xxx.c:172:22: warning: symbol
> 'omap3_prm_irqs' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Turquette <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm2xxx_3xxx.c |   22 +++++++++++-----------
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm2xxx_3xxx.h |    7 +++++--
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm44xx.c      |   28 ++++++++++++++--------------
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm44xx.h      |    7 +++++--
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/vp.h           |    9 ---------
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/vp3xxx_data.c  |    4 ++--
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/vp44xx_data.c  |    6 +++---
>  7 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to