Jean Pihet <[email protected]> writes:

> Mike, Kevin,
>
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Mike Turquette <[email protected]> wrote:
>> From: Nishanth Menon <[email protected]>
>>
>> We have multiple interrupt status hidden in the PRM interrupt status
>> reg. Make this handling generic to allow us to pull out LDO status such
>> as those for ABB from it using the same data structure and indexing. We
>> hence rename accordingly.
> I am not sure that the rename is needed.
>
> Kevin, Nishant, what is your opinion?

Rename is mostly fine.

I think the patch is correct, since the interrupts are technically for
the the whole PRM, not just the VP.

However, I don't like  the s/vp_id/irq_id/ in the APIs, because the APIs
are intended to be VP specific.

I'll likely pull/fold the parts I agree with into the original patch in
my VP cleanup series

Kevin

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to