On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 01:23:50PM +0000, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote:

> By the way, if we look at all the regulator added (DT supported) till now have
> the similar problem.

> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi

This is fine - the SoC contains integrated regulators which supply other
bits of the Soc so we can be confident that the hookup is good just
based on the silicon.

> arch/arm/boot/dts/twl4030.dtsi
> arch/arm/boot/dts/twl6030.dtsi

These appear to have similar issues and should be fixed, at least as far
as the voltage ranges go.

> arch/arm/boot/dts/db8500.dtsi

I'm not actually seeing anything terribly problematic here, though the
regulator-name properties should really be removed as they're fairly
useless and seem to be missing the point of having the property.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to