On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 1:44 AM, Linus Walleij <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> When a GPIO is defined as an interrupt line using Device
>> Tree, a call to irq_create_of_mapping() is made that calls
>> irq_create_mapping(). So, is not necessary to do the mapping
>> for all OMAP GPIO lines and explicitly call irq_create_mapping()
>> on the driver probe() when booting with Device Tree.
>>
>> Add a custom IRQ domain .map function handler that will be
>> called by irq_create_mapping() to map the GPIO lines used as IRQ.
>> This also allows to execute needed setup code such as configuring
>> a GPIO as input and enabling the GPIO bank.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <[email protected]>
>> Tested-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <[email protected]>
>> Acked-by: Grant Likely <[email protected]>
>> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes since v3:
>> - Use bank->chip.of_node instead of_have_populated_dt() to check
>> DT or legacy boot as suggested by Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
>
> This does not apply to the "next" branch on my GPIO tree,
> i.e:
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-gpio.git/
>
> Not even with fuzzing :-(
>
> Can you rebase them?
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
> --
Hi Linus,
Yes, It doesn't apply cleanly to your "next" branch cleanly because
this patch-set depends on the following bugfix patch merged late on
the -rc cycle (3.10-rc7):
397eada9 ("gpio/omap: don't use linear domain mapping for OMAP1")
but your next branch is based on Linux 3.10-rc3.
So, I could change the patches so they can be applied cleanly on your
branch but then it will not apply cleanly when you send your pull
request to Torvalds.
Thanks a lot and best regards,
Javier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
