On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Alexander Holler <[email protected]> wrote:
> Am 28.06.2013 17:27, schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas:
>
>> When a GPIO is defined as an interrupt line using Device
>> Tree, a call to irq_create_of_mapping() is made that calls
>> irq_create_mapping(). So, is not necessary to do the mapping
>> for all OMAP GPIO lines and explicitly call irq_create_mapping()
>> on the driver probe() when booting with Device Tree.
>>
>> Add a custom IRQ domain .map function handler that will be
>> called by irq_create_mapping() to map the GPIO lines used as IRQ.
>> This also allows to execute needed setup code such as configuring
>> a GPIO as input and enabling the GPIO bank.
>
>
> This patch basically broke every usage of
>
> irq = gpio_to_irq(gpio);
> request[_threaded]_irq(irq, ...);
>
> because request[_threaded]_irq(irq, ...) now fails because of a missing
> irq_domain (no mapping => no domain).

OK and I had ACKs from Santosh and even a Test-by tag from Enric
on that thing.

What shall we do with this mess now?

I was told that these patches really needed to be applied because
they were fixing a regression in v3.11, and now it seems they are
causing another regression.

What I need to know is what is worst: having these three patches
there or reverting them?

Or should I simply revert *all* the TI GPIO stuff merged for v3.11
now that is seems like this is a can of worms? :-/

Tony, Kevin, Santosh, someone? What will make all happy?

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to