Hi everyone, On 09.10.2013 08:18, Gururaja Hebbar wrote: > On Wednesday 09 October 2013 11:33 AM, Fernandes, Joel wrote: >> Some temporary issues with my mua so forgive any artifacts in this >> email. >> >> On Oct 9, 2013, at 12:14 AM, "Hebbar, Gururaja" >> <gururaja.heb...@ti.com> wrote: >> >>> On Wednesday 09 October 2013 09:58 AM, Joel Fernandes wrote: >>>> On 10/01/2013 10:04 AM, Daniel Mack wrote:
>>> AFAIK, Suspend/resume should be quick. Allocating and >>> deallocating on every iterating would be useless and time >>> consuming. >> >> Nobody said allocate and deallocate on every iteration. Allocate >> once during the first suspend call and then don't have to allocate >> on subsequent calls. > > I couldn't find any code which allocates parameters inside suspend. Me neighter :) But on a general note, I wonder whether it's really worth discussing and merging this patch. As I wrote in the cover letter, it's just a quick and dirty solution that I copied from a very old BSP tree, and I know that the file I'm patching here is going to be removed soon anyway. Actually, the sooner the better. (And the 'v3' in the subject is really my bad, sorry - I only sent one version of this patch ever). I can respin the patch on top of the proper driver once all the edma bits have eventually been moved to drivers/dma. Is anyone continuing Matt Porter's work on this? Thanks, Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
