http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7264
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-05 17:29 ------- On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 15:17:02 -0700 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 15:04:47 -0700 > Kristen Carlson Accardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 14:47:29 -0700 > > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > (added bugzilla to cc) > > > On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 23:34:25 +0200 > > > Pavel Kysilka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu Oct 05, 2006 at 01:32:47PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > > > > The patch titled > > > > > > > > > > revert "PCI: quirk for IBM Dock II cardbus controllers" > > > > > > > > > > has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is > > > > > > > > > > revert-pci-quirk-for-ibm-dock-ii-cardbus-controllers.patch > > > > > > > > > > See http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/added-to-mm.txt > > > > > to find > > > > > out what to do about this > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > Subject: revert "PCI: quirk for IBM Dock II cardbus controllers" > > > > > From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > Daniel thinks this might fix > > > > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7264 > > > > > > > > > > Pavel, can you let us know if this patch fixes it please? > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > patch fixes problem. Complete dmesg will be saved in bugzilla. > > > > > > > > > > hm, OK, thanks for testing. > > > > > > Now what? > > > > So, the original patch was for enabling docking for the T20. Basically, > > without the patch, the interrupts are all routed incorrectly on the > > cardbus controllers on the dock station when you hotdock. If we > > revert this patch, we are going to break docking on the T20. I'm ok > > with that - I think it is far better to not oops. And the patch isn't > > needed on newer systems (like T40) which have less brain death. I > > think we could decide to just let docking break on these older systems. > > > > Could we use DMI info to work out whether the quirk is needed? Would it be possible to get the result of lspci -v -xxx without the quirk, with the system booted in the dock station. thanks, Kristen ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. _______________________________________________ Linux PCMCIA reimplementation list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pcmcia
