On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:14:23 -0700 Randy Dunlap <[email protected]> wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH -next] pcmcia: fix controller printk warnings Why the "-next"? > > drivers/pcmcia/i82365.c:1055: warning: format '%#x' expects type 'unsigned > int', but argument 6 has type 'phys_addr_t' > drivers/pcmcia/i82365.c:1055: warning: format '%#x' expects type 'unsigned > int', but argument 7 has type 'phys_addr_t' > drivers/pcmcia/tcic.c:734: warning: format '%#x' expects type 'unsigned int', > but argument 6 has type 'phys_addr_t' > drivers/pcmcia/tcic.c:734: warning: format '%#x' expects type 'unsigned int', > but argument 7 has type 'phys_addr_t' afacit this patch is needed in mainline also, but the "-next" indicates that it's only needed in linux-next. This sends me scrabbling around trying to work out why the "-next" was added. _______________________________________________ Linux PCMCIA reimplementation list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pcmcia
