On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:34:03 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:14:23 -0700 > Randy Dunlap <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Subject: [PATCH -next] pcmcia: fix controller printk warnings > > Why the "-next"? > > > > > drivers/pcmcia/i82365.c:1055: warning: format '%#x' expects type 'unsigned > > int', but argument 6 has type 'phys_addr_t' > > drivers/pcmcia/i82365.c:1055: warning: format '%#x' expects type 'unsigned > > int', but argument 7 has type 'phys_addr_t' > > drivers/pcmcia/tcic.c:734: warning: format '%#x' expects type 'unsigned > > int', but argument 6 has type 'phys_addr_t' > > drivers/pcmcia/tcic.c:734: warning: format '%#x' expects type 'unsigned > > int', but argument 7 has type 'phys_addr_t' > > afacit this patch is needed in mainline also, but the "-next" indicates > that it's only needed in linux-next. This sends me scrabbling around > trying to work out why the "-next" was added.
That's where I encountered the warnings. --- ~Randy LPC 2009, Sept. 23-25, Portland, Oregon http://linuxplumbersconf.org/2009/ _______________________________________________ Linux PCMCIA reimplementation list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pcmcia
