Em Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 11:28:37AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > Em Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 01:54:58PM +0100, Milian Wolff escreveu: > > On Tuesday, November 3, 2015 9:06:31 AM CET Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > Em Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 08:33:25AM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu: > > > > On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 06:19:44PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > > > > wrote: > > > > > So, you tried this patch, right? Jiri, have you submitted this in some > > > > > other message I missed? > > > > > > > > nope.. I thought Milian would take it ;-) > > > > > > I can take it, as soon as you guys agree its something I should :-) > > > > Yes, I think it's good as-is. Should I resubmit Jiris patch? Considering > > that > > he rewrote the patch, should he send it and add me as tester? How do you > > handle such situations in the Kernel land? > > So, I'll fix this all up by adding a Signed-off-by: Jiri and a
I take that back, can one of you please write a nice description to the problem and how the proposed patch fixes it, then send as a separate message with your Tested-by + Signed-off-by? - Arnaldo > Tested-by: Millian, which I think I can do according to the above > messages and past experience, but the Correct Way to do this would > be for Jiri to collect your Tested-by and resubmit in a separate > message, not as a patch added to the text of a thread. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-perf-users" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
