Em Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 03:32:07PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu: > On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 11:28:37AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 01:54:58PM +0100, Milian Wolff escreveu: > > > On Tuesday, November 3, 2015 9:06:31 AM CET Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > > > wrote: > > > > I can take it, as soon as you guys agree its something I should :-) > > > > > > Yes, I think it's good as-is. Should I resubmit Jiris patch? Considering > > > that > > > he rewrote the patch, should he send it and add me as tester? How do you > > > handle such situations in the Kernel land?
> > So, I'll fix this all up by adding a Signed-off-by: Jiri and a > > Tested-by: Millian, which I think I can do according to the above > > messages and past experience, but the Correct Way to do this would > > be for Jiri to collect your Tested-by and resubmit in a separate > > message, not as a patch added to the text of a thread. > well, I'd rather take it then and test it.. I sent > it out completely untested.. just to show what I meant > > I'll resend and add some test code Sounds like a plan, thanks in advance, - Arnaldo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-perf-users" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
