On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:22:22AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 03:16:11PM +0000, Stroller wrote: > > So can I ask why was the kernel patch rejected? Was this all done on > > the LKML, and can we find the discussion in the LKML archives? > > > > It sounds like we should maybe all be giving you guys at Dell credit > > for trying to do it right in the first place. > > Here are the slides and video from LPC. The slides note all the > previous rejected proposals... > > http://linux.dell.com/files/presentations/Linux_Plumbers_Conf_2010/matt-domsch-network-device-naming.pdf > http://linux.dell.com/files/presentations/Linux_Plumbers_Conf_2010/matt-domsch-network-device-naming.ogg
And a previous presentation at LinuxCon 2010: http://linux.dell.com/files/presentations/LinuxCon_2010/linuxcon2010_domsch.pdf -- Matt Domsch Technology Strategist Dell | Office of the CTO _______________________________________________ Linux-PowerEdge mailing list [email protected] https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq
