On Sat, 13 Feb 1999, John LeMay wrote:
> Now I'm even more baffled! If the typedef statement is there, why would
> it complain that the type is not defined? AURGH! 
 
Maybe you could try compiling with gcc -E foo.c |less and see what is
going on?

-- 
____/|  Ragnar Hojland  ([EMAIL PROTECTED])      Fingerprint  94C4B
\ o.O|                                                   2F0D27DE025BE2302C
 =(_)=  "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer for      104B78C56 B72F0822
   U     chaos and madness await thee at its end."       hkp://keys.pgp.com


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ppp" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to