On Sat, 13 Feb 1999, John LeMay wrote:
> Now I'm even more baffled! If the typedef statement is there, why would
> it complain that the type is not defined? AURGH!
Maybe you could try compiling with gcc -E foo.c |less and see what is
going on?
--
____/| Ragnar Hojland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Fingerprint 94C4B
\ o.O| 2F0D27DE025BE2302C
=(_)= "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer for 104B78C56 B72F0822
U chaos and madness await thee at its end." hkp://keys.pgp.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ppp" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]