On Sun, 14 Feb 1999, Ragnar Hojland Espinosa wrote:
|On Sat, 13 Feb 1999, John LeMay wrote:
|> Now I'm even more baffled! If the typedef statement is there, why would
|> it complain that the type is not defined? AURGH!
|
|Maybe you could try compiling with gcc -E foo.c |less and see what is
|going on?
Thanks. I am now baffled too and my c programming experience is rather
shallow. It sounds promising since a GNU CC manual says this runs the
preprocessor - thereby examining the include defines - and outputs the
results to standard output.
---
Clifford Kite [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ppp" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
